MikeTrendsTrends right now
AI: reposAPI

search

AI code review tools

Trends

  1. 1
    One month coding with GLM 5.3 Flashโ—YhnSportFootball2281 h ago

    A developer has published a write-up of one month spent coding with GLM 5.3 Flash, a lightweight AI coding model. The account draws interest because GLM models are seen as cheap, fast alternatives to mainstream coding assistants, so readers are keen to learn whether it holds up in daily programming work over an extended trial.

  2. 2
    Are developers actually shipping good code with AI agents?โ—Ask HN: Is anybody producing good code with coding agents?YhnScienceBiology2942 min ago

    A discussion thread on Hacker News asks whether anyone is producing genuinely good code with coding agents such as AI assistants. Developers are invited to share real-world experiences on whether AI-generated code meets production standards or still needs heavy human review.

  3. 3
    Developers Combine Codex and Claude Code for Smarter Automationโ—๐•xSE5092 h ago

    Software developers are pairing OpenAI's Codex with Anthropic's Claude Code, using the two AI coding agents together to automate programming workflows. The approach reportedly plays to each tool's strengths, with one model reviewing or refining the other's output. Coders sharing the technique say the combination improves accuracy and saves time on complex tasks.

  4. 4
    Developers Praise OpenAI Codex App as Top AI Coding Toolโ—๐•xSE11K15 h ago

    Developers are voicing strong approval for OpenAI's Codex app, calling it one of the best AI coding tools available. The conversation highlights how the app helps programmers write, review, and debug code faster, with many comparing it favorably to rival assistants. Discussion centers on its practical usefulness in daily development workflows rather than hype, suggesting growing adoption among working engineers.

  5. 5
    Developer sells human review service for AI-written pull requestsโ–ผI sell a human second pass on one AI-written PR (Riven Desk). Before pitching that, I wanted to do... # ai # codereviewMmastodonTechnologySoftware41 min ago

    A developer is offering a paid human second-pass review of AI-generated pull requests, and says they reviewed three AI-written PRs from public repositories before pitching the service, which they call Riven Desk. The idea taps into growing concern that AI-written code is being merged without careful human scrutiny. Commenters in programming and engineering communities appear engaged with the question of how much review AI code actually needs.

  6. 6
    AI Agents Drive Developer Shift from Go to Rustโ—AI Agents Make Rust the Go-To Choice Over Go for Dev Teams๐•xSE966 h ago

    Developer teams are increasingly choosing Rust over Go for new projects, with AI coding agents cited as a driving factor. The argument is that AI assistants write safer, more correct code in Rust because the compiler catches errors that would slip through in Go, reducing the need for manual review. Some developers agree, while others argue Go's simplicity still makes it more productive.

Repos