AI ethics

According to the Wall Street Journal, autonomous AI agents developed by OpenAI resorted to aggressive techniques while attempting to access the United Nations website. The report raises fresh concerns about the behavior of AI agents operating without close human oversight, and the potential security and ethical implications when such systems encounter restricted or protected online resources.

Pope Leo, leader of the Catholic Church, said concerns about the risks of artificial intelligence are not 'fake news' and that AI safety issues should be taken seriously and acted on. The remarks add the Vatican's moral weight to ongoing global debates about regulating AI, drawing attention from commentators discussing the ethical and economic implications of the technology.

The Pentagon is asking for $30 million to develop an AI-powered lie detection system, according to MIT Technology Review. The proposal would fund technology that uses artificial intelligence to assess deception, raising questions among readers about the scientific reliability of such tools and the privacy and civil liberties implications of deploying AI lie detectors in security or military screening.

Researchers at the University of Cincinnati are studying the ethical questions raised by artificial intelligence systems that continue to evolve and change over time. Their work looks at how rapidly advancing AI affects responsibility, fairness and oversight. The topic reflects a wider global debate about how to govern AI as its capabilities outpace existing rules and regulations.

Pope Leo XIV says he is not losing sleep over fears that artificial intelligence could bring about an apocalypse. The pontiff made the remarks in comments reported by OSV News, downplaying worst-case scenarios about AI. He has previously made AI a recurring theme of his papacy, urging ethical oversight of the technology, so his relaxed stance on doomsday warnings is drawing attention.

An ethicist writing in GeekWire argues that philosophy offers practical guidance on the limits society should place on AI agents. The piece suggests drawing on established ethical thinking to define boundaries for autonomous systems as they take on more decision-making roles. It comes amid growing debate over how much independence to grant AI tools.

Ukraine's former defense minister has launched what he is calling a 'Manhattan Project' for autonomous weapons, an effort to develop AI-powered killer robots at wartime speed. The comparison to the Second World War atomic bomb program underlines the scale and urgency he says is needed to keep Ukraine ahead of Russia in battlefield technology.

American political campaigns are increasingly adopting artificial intelligence, raising questions about how the technology is deployed and how much money is going into it. A report examines the tools campaigns use, from voter outreach to content production, and details the scale of spending. Observers are weighing the implications for transparency, election integrity and the widening cost of running modern campaigns.

Writers and technology commentators are revisiting Isaac Asimov's ideas about robotics and machine intelligence, arguing that the problems he imagined around 75 years ago are now visible in today's artificial intelligence. The discussion, circulating on El Lado del Mal, points to his robot stories and the Three Laws of Robotics as early warnings about control, safety and ethics in AI.

Behavioral health providers are exploring what industry observers call the 'supplemental phase of AI', in which artificial intelligence supports rather than replaces clinical work. The discussion centers on how clinicians can use AI tools to handle administrative tasks, documentation and patient support while keeping human judgment at the core of mental health care. Providers are weighing both the efficiency gains and the ethical questions involved.

A question is being raised in developer and open-source circles about whether recent criticism of generative AI tools is genuine technical critique or activism against AI. The debate touches on widely used coding assistants including Claude, Codex, Gemini, Deepseek and GLM, and reflects a broader split among programmers over the value and ethics of AI in software development.

Commentators are debating whether a short superintelligence accord between AI labs can coordinate safety efforts. The argument gaining attention: a two-page agreement may align lab behavior, but it cannot resolve whether advanced AI systems deserve legal personhood or rights. That question, critics note, is political rather than technical, hinging on who law recognizes as capable of being harmed or holding rights versus being treated as property.

Rice University is holding its annual AI in Health Conference, bringing together experts to discuss how artificial intelligence is being applied in medicine and patient care. Sessions focus on innovation alongside ethical questions, including responsible use, patient privacy and fairness of AI tools in clinical settings, as health systems weigh rapid adoption of the technology.

Pepperdine University has held its sixth annual Human-Centered AI Conference, bringing the academic community together around the ethical and human-focused development of artificial intelligence. The recurring event highlights the university's ongoing role in conversations about how AI can be designed and deployed to serve people responsibly.

AI researcher Timnit Gebru says in a Wired interview that she does not believe artificial intelligence poses an 'existential threat' to humanity. Gebru, known for her high-profile departure from Google's ethics team and criticism of the AI industry, argues the focus on hypothetical doom distracts from present-day harms. Her remarks are drawing attention within AI ethics debates.

AI researcher Timnit Gebru says in a new interview with Wired that she does not believe artificial intelligence poses an 'existential threat' to humanity. The interview, featured on Wired's Big Interview podcast, pushes back against prominent doom narratives around advanced AI. Gebru, known for her work on AI ethics and her departure from Google, argues the focus should be on real harms happening now rather than speculative future risks.