AI surveillance

Classified estimates indicate the National Security Agency is paying billions of dollars to test artificial intelligence models, according to a new report. The figures suggest US intelligence agencies are pouring major funding into evaluating advanced AI systems, sparking debate about surveillance implications, government oversight, and the scale of public money flowing into AI development.

The Pentagon is asking for $30.3 million over five years to develop an AI-powered lie detection system that can analyze body language remotely, without physical contact. The program, called Polygraph Next, is included in the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency's 2027 budget request. Commenters are raising concerns about the privacy implications and scientific reliability of automated deception detection, noting that traditional polygraph accuracy is already contested.

Reporter Ken Klippenstein reports that US federal authorities have characterized critics of artificial intelligence as potential foreign agents. The claim, published on his Substack, suggests the government may be scrutinizing AI skeptics under foreign-influence frameworks. The report is drawing attention online, where readers are debating whether such scrutiny amounts to targeting legitimate criticism of the AI industry.

The Pentagon is asking for $30 million to develop an AI-powered lie detection system, according to MIT Technology Review. The proposal would fund technology that uses artificial intelligence to assess deception, raising questions among readers about the scientific reliability of such tools and the privacy and civil liberties implications of deploying AI lie detectors in security or military screening.

An AI researcher is warning that the most serious threat from artificial intelligence is not sci-fi scenarios of robot armies, but the gradual erosion of democratic institutions. The argument is that AI-driven misinformation, surveillance and concentration of power could undermine elections and public debate long before any physical danger materialises. The warning adds to a growing debate about whether AI policy should focus on existential risks or on protecting civic and democratic life.

A digital camouflage shirt designed to prevent AI-based surveillance systems from recognising the wearer has been unveiled. The garment uses patterns intended to confuse computer vision algorithms that detect and track people in public spaces. It highlights growing public interest in privacy-protection clothing as facial recognition and AI monitoring become more widespread.