search
Equality Now
Trends
- 1Colorado coaches welcome Senate passage of Protect College Sports Act●'An equal playing field,' Colorado coaches react to Senate passing the Protect College Sports Act
The US Senate has passed the Protect College Sports Act, drawing reactions from college coaches in Colorado. Coaches told Denver7 the legislation could create 'an equal playing field' in college athletics. The comments come as debates continue over rules and fairness in college sports nationwide.
- 2Today's Founders Face the Internet's Early Credibility Test●The Internet Once Sounded Like Lunacy. Today’s Founders Face the Same Test
Commentary argues that early internet ideas once sounded like lunacy to skeptics, yet transformed the economy. It draws a parallel to today's founders pushing technologies that seem equally implausible, suggesting entrepreneurs should expect ridicule and press on anyway. The piece invites readers to reconsider which currently dismissed ideas might define the next few decades of business and technology.
- 3Singapore sociologist Teo You Yenn critiques state pro-family policy●Teo You Yenn, Singapore academic in her book on family in Singapore “Unease”: “Pro-family: the obsession with defining a
Sociologist Teo You Yenn, author of a book on family life in Singapore, argues that the state's pro-family agenda is fixated on defining and policing the boundaries of what counts as a family — its make-up, roles and responsibilities — without equal attention to supporting people's actual needs. Readers are sharing the passage and debating whether Singapore's family policies leave too many people out.
- 4Women's Rights Sidelined as AI Dominates UN General Assembly Debate●Strategic Blindness at UNGA 81: “Super Intelligence” and “Killer Robots” Take Center Stage as Women’s Rights Take a Back Seat
Commentary around the 81st UN General Assembly argues that emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and autonomous 'killer robots', dominated the agenda while women's rights received far less attention. The piece criticizes what it calls 'strategic blindness', suggesting member states and diplomats prioritized futuristic tech threats over longstanding gender equality commitments. Critics say this reflects shifting global priorities and risks rolling back progress on women's rights at the UN.