Federal Court

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain journalists from White House press access, ordering that reporters be allowed back into press events. The decision is being widely covered as a significant test of First Amendment protections, with supporters calling it a victory for press freedom and the administration expected to contest or work around the ruling.

A federal judge has temporarily paused the Trump administration's ban barring CNN from the White House, and the network's reporters were allowed back into the building. The case has become a flashpoint in the broader fight over press access and the administration's efforts to penalize news outlets it views as unfavorable.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM to allegations that it failed to comply with a court order concerning press access. The deadline sets up a rapid test of whether the administration will follow the ruling, and the story is drawing heavy attention as a fresh flashpoint in ongoing disputes between the administration and the press corps over First Amendment access.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit to vacate a federal drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized aerial recording of immigration agents. The group argues the restriction blocks journalists and the public from documenting enforcement operations, raising First Amendment concerns. Commenters online are debating the balance between airspace security and the right to observe government agents at work.

A Supreme Court ruling concerning a disputed election may conflict with existing state law, according to reporting by Honolulu Civil Beat. The ruling raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial decisions and state statutes point in different directions. Further details about which state, which election, and the specific legal provisions involved were not provided in the available information.

A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, warning Attorney General Pam Bondi that contempt charges could follow if the department continues to withhold them. The order describes contempt as 'premature' for now, but signals the court is losing patience with the DOJ's stalling on the disclosures.

A federal court has ruled that the Pentagon can designate Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude chatbot, as a supply chain risk. The decision allows the Defense Department to maintain restrictions or scrutiny over Anthropic's role in federal contracting, raising questions about how AI firms are treated under national security procurement rules.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, according to a CNBC report. The ruling maintains a decision tied to Pentagon-related concerns over the company's role in federal supply chains. The designation is significant for the AI sector, as it could affect Anthropic's ability to win government contracts and signals heightened scrutiny of major AI providers in national security contexts.

The White House has revoked CNN's access once more, openly defying a federal judge's order that had barred the administration from excluding the network. The move escalates the standoff between the administration and the press over press freedom, and the network is expected to challenge the ban in court again.

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a dismissal of patent claims against Google under Section 101, which governs patent-eligible subject matter in the United States. The case concerned internet advertising patents, and the appeals court agreed they could not stand. The decision is being followed closely by intellectual property lawyers and tech companies, as it reinforces how courts treat software and advertising-related patents under current eligibility standards.

Leonardo DiCaprio and Anna Wintour were among the celebrities attending the Laver Cup, the team tennis event co-founded by Roger Federer. Their presence drew attention alongside the on-court action, adding star power to the stands as the tournament brought together top players from Team Europe and the rest of the world.

A federal judge has ruled that Oklahoma cannot block a Jewish charter school from opening in the state. The decision resolves a dispute over state officials' refusal to approve the school. The ruling is likely to fuel ongoing national debate over charter schools with religious affiliations and the separation of church and state.

A federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the revival of the $7 billion Solar for All program, which the Trump administration had canceled. The program funded solar energy projects aimed at low-income and disadvantaged communities across the United States. The ruling means the administration must restart the program while related legal challenges over the cancellation move forward.

A high court has ruled that election officials may use a federal database to help identify and remove ineligible voters from registration rolls. The decision clarifies the legality of cross-checking voter records against federal data, a practice that has drawn debate between those who see it as protecting election integrity and those concerned about wrongful removals of eligible voters.

A federal court has ruled that Tennessee cannot criminalize speech about topics its Republican supermajority and attorney general deem objectionable, and cannot enforce its abortion ban beyond state lines to regulate lawful conduct elsewhere. The ruling blocks the state from penalizing adults who help minors obtain abortions out of state, drawing attention from reproductive rights advocates and legal observers.