Federal courts

A US judge has overturned President Trump's ban on certain media outlets from White House coverage. The ruling blocks the administration from excluding journalists from presidential events, a move critics called an attack on press freedom. Supporters of the president are expected to challenge the decision, and the case is likely to move through the appeals courts, keeping the fight over media access in the spotlight.

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain journalists from White House press access, overturning the exclusion policy. The decision restores press credentials and access for affected outlets and is being widely covered by major news organizations including CNN. The ruling is seen as a significant check on the administration's control over media access to the presidency and is likely to be appealed.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows state officials to cross-check voter registration records against the immigration database, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Critics argue such checks risk wrongly purging eligible voters, particularly naturalised citizens, while supporters frame the ruling as a victory for election integrity.

The Mexican government has filed a lawsuit against Meta, accusing the company of human rights violations, in a federal court. The case was reported by Milenio and has drawn broad attention, as it marks an unusual direct legal challenge by Mexico against one of the world's largest technology companies over alleged rights abuses.

A coalition of news organizations has asked a federal court to bar the White House from enforcing a ban on access for certain journalists. The legal challenge argues the administration's restrictions violate press freedom protections, and the case is drawing wide attention as a test of limits on government control over media access.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM regarding its non-compliance with a press-related court order. The development marks an escalation in an ongoing legal dispute over press access, and the deadline is expected to reveal whether the administration will comply with the court's directives.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, a decision with major implications for the Pentagon's ability to work with the firm. The ruling reinforces federal authority to restrict AI providers deemed security concerns from defense-related procurement, and is being closely watched across the tech and defense industries for what it signals about oversight of leading artificial intelligence companies.

A federal court ruling has cleared the way for a Jewish charter school to open in Oklahoma. The decision is significant because charter schools are publicly funded, raising unresolved questions about the separation of church and state. The case is expected to draw further legal challenges as other states and religious groups watch closely for its implications on publicly funded religious education.

Federal agencies are removing the so-called Trump 'loyalty question' from job applications following a federal judge's ruling earlier this month that the question is likely unconstitutional. The question, introduced during the Trump administration, asked applicants about their allegiance to the president. The quiet removal suggests agencies are complying with the court's decision without public announcement, and the story is drawing attention as part of ongoing debates over civil service independence and the politicization of federal hiring.

Borrowers enrolled in the SAVE student loan repayment plan face an approaching deadline to leave the program. The federal plan, blocked by courts, is being wound down, and affected borrowers must move to another income-driven repayment option or risk consequences for their loans. Reports advise borrowers to act before the deadline to avoid being placed in less favorable terms.

An Illinois court has ruled that the Illinois Interest Act's preemption applies to federal credit unions, extending earlier preemption reasoning under the IFPA to those institutions. The decision clarifies that state law limits on interest and fees do not apply to federally chartered credit unions operating in Illinois, a point of significance for lenders and consumer finance compliance in the state.

A federal judge has upheld an Idaho law that prohibits daycares from requiring vaccines or other medical treatments as a condition of enrollment. The ruling means childcare facilities in the state cannot deny care to unvaccinated children. Supporters view the decision as a win for parental choice, while public health advocates warn it could weaken protection against preventable diseases among young children.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.

Utah Senator Mike Lee is pushing for the impeachment of a federal judge who ruled against President Trump, and has asked supporters for $5 donations to back the effort. The move escalates Republican criticism of the judiciary and raises questions about congressional retaliation against judges over rulings, drawing scrutiny over the independence of the federal courts and the use of fundraising around impeachment efforts.

A US court has ruled against prediction market operator Kalshi, holding that states retain the authority to regulate prediction markets operating within their borders. The decision is a setback for Kalshi's expansion strategy, which has relied on federal oversight of event contracts. It may prompt further legal fights over whether prediction markets fall under federal or state gambling and derivatives law.

Recent court victories for the 'Solar for All' program are prompting discussion about what they mean for litigation brought by grantee organizations. The program, which funds solar projects in low-income communities, scored wins in legal challenges, but analysts are weighing how these outcomes shape future lawsuits involving program grantees and whether the legal strategy will continue to protect federal clean energy funding.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is calling on the DC Circuit to vacate a federal drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized aerial recording of immigration enforcement agents. The group argues the restriction blocks First Amendment-protected documentation of federal operations. The case is drawing attention amid heightened public scrutiny of immigration enforcement tactics across the United States.

The Trump Justice Department is moving to challenge state laws that allow undocumented immigrants to pay in-state college tuition, setting up a legal clash between federal authority and state policies. The push targets statutes in several states that grant lower tuition rates regardless of immigration status, and it is likely to spark court battles and debate over states' rights, immigration enforcement, and access to higher education.

A federal court has struck down conditions imposed by the Trump administration that tied anti-terrorism funding to election-related demands. The Brennan Center for Justice highlighted the ruling, which blocks the administration from leveraging security grants to influence how elections are run. Critics had argued the conditions amounted to improper federal pressure on state election administration.

Several news organisations barred from White House access are asking a federal judge to extend a court order blocking the administration from enforcing the ban. The outlets argue the restrictions amount to unconstitutional retaliation against coverage the White House dislikes, while administration lawyers defend the move as a lawful exercise of control over presidential events. A ruling on the extended block is expected imminently.

A group of news organizations is asking a federal court to stop the White House from enforcing a ban targeting them until the legal challenge is resolved. The request is part of an ongoing lawsuit over the ban, with outlets arguing it should not take effect while the case proceeds through the courts.

A federal court has ruled that prediction market operator Kalshi is subject to Tennessee's gambling laws in relation to its sports event contracts. The decision means the company cannot treat its sports offerings as federally regulated derivatives exempt from state gambling regulation, and it could shape how states oversee sports prediction markets and similar platforms operating nationwide.

The Bureau of Land Management has appealed a federal judge's order that halted a logging project in Oregon over concerns about old-growth forest protections. The ruling had blocked the agency from proceeding with timber sales, and the appeal sets up a fresh legal fight over how public lands with mature and old-growth trees are managed. Environmental groups have pushed to preserve such forests, while the agency argues its project complies with federal law.