search
Justice
Trends
- 1UN roundup: US migration policy, refugee funding, forests, Colombia justice▼World News in Brief: Refugee funding, US migration policy triggers ‘cascade’ of rights violations, world forests report, restorative justice in Colombia
A UN News roundup highlights four stories: a warning that US migration policy is triggering a 'cascade' of human rights violations, a funding shortfall affecting refugees, a new global report on the state of the world's forests, and efforts to advance restorative justice in Colombia. The items reflect ongoing UN concern over migration enforcement, humanitarian financing, deforestation and post-conflict reconciliation.
- 2Justice Alito Steps Aside From Climate Change Dispute●Justice Alito will no longer participate in climate change dispute
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change dispute before the court. His withdrawal means the case will be heard by only eight justices, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place without a binding national precedent. The court has not detailed the reason for his recusal, and observers are weighing its potential impact on how the climate case is ultimately resolved.
- 3Italian court convicts three Egyptians over Regeni kidnapping●Italian court convicts three Egyptians for kidnapping slain student Regeni
An Italian court has convicted three Egyptian security officials for their role in the kidnapping of Giulio Regeni, the Cambridge University student tortured and killed in Egypt in 2016. The verdict delivers partial justice, as none of the defendants were present at trial and no one has been convicted for Regeni's murder itself. The case has long strained relations between Italy and Egypt.
- 4Trump plan to weaken Endangered Species Act cites 1995 Scalia dissent●Trump's sneaky plan to gut Endangered Species Act draws from 1995 Scalia dissent
The Trump administration is pursuing changes that would significantly weaken the Endangered Species Act, and the legal strategy reportedly draws on Justice Antonin Scalia's 1995 dissent, which argued for a narrower reading of the law's habitat protections. Critics call the approach a stealth effort to gut protections for at-risk wildlife, while supporters frame it as reining in regulatory overreach.
- 5
Andrew Bailey has resigned from his role as deputy director of the FBI, according to reports circulating widely. Bailey, a former Missouri attorney general, was appointed to the post in 2025. Details about the reason for his departure and who will replace him have not yet been made clear, and observers are awaiting official confirmation from the bureau or the Justice Department.
- 6
The UN human rights office has welcomed what it calls landmark restorative justice steps in Colombia. The developments are being framed as a significant advance for transitional justice and victims' rights in the country, which continues to deal with the legacy of decades of armed conflict. Human rights groups are watching closely for how the measures will be implemented.
- 7Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate case●Alito recuses from major climate change case to be decided by the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case pending before the court. With eight justices instead of nine, the outcome could end in a 4-4 tie, which would leave the lower court's ruling in place without setting a national precedent. No reason for the recusal has been given, and observers are watching closely for what it may signal about the case's wider implications.
- 8Justice Alito Recuses Himself From Major Climate Case●In reversal, Justice Samuel Alito steps aside from major climate case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate case, reversing an earlier decision to take part in it. The move comes as the court weighs disputes with significant consequences for climate regulation. Little further detail is available about his reasons or the specific case involved, and reaction so far is limited to initial news reports.
- 9Justice Department Charges 12 Individuals in Election Crimes Cases▼Justice Department Announces Charges and Guilty Pleas Involving 12 Individuals for Election Crimes
The US Department of Justice has announced charges and guilty pleas involving 12 individuals in connection with election crimes. The department disclosed the cases in a public announcement, though details of the specific offenses, jurisdictions, and sentences have not yet been widely reported. The announcement comes amid heightened national attention on election integrity and the enforcement of voting laws ahead of upcoming elections.
- 10Tsikhanouskaya's Office meets rights defenders on Belarus repression▼Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya’s Office and human rights defenders discussed Belarusians’ safety and the regime’s accountability for repression
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya's Office and human rights defenders held discussions on the safety of Belarusians and on holding Alexander Lukashenko's regime accountable for repression. The meeting focused on protecting citizens facing persecution and on international mechanisms to document abuses and pursue justice for political prisoners and exiles.
- 11Germany's foreign minister backs ICC despite Trump sanctions●Germany’s foreign minister visits the ICC, pledging full support despite Trump's sanctions
Germany's foreign minister visited the International Criminal Court in The Hague, pledging Berlin's full support for the institution despite US sanctions imposed under the Trump administration. The visit signals Germany's continued commitment to international justice, though it comes after Berlin also announced its own sanctions targeting ICC officials, creating a mixed picture of Europe's stance toward the court.
- 12Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Allow Denying Hormones to Trans Inmates▼Trump Administration Asks Justices to Allow It to Deny Hormones to Trans Inmates https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/us/p
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to let it deny hormone therapy to transgender inmates, in a move reported by the New York Times. The filing asks the justices to intervene in litigation over prison healthcare for transgender people. The request is drawing attention from civil rights advocates and reigniting debate over transgender rights and the treatment of incarcerated people under the administration.
- 13Supreme Court vote shadows Collins in Maine Senate race▼Supreme Court vote shadows Maine Sen. Susan Collins in her first race after abortion rights decision
Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first re-election campaign since voting to confirm Supreme Court justices who later helped overturn federal abortion rights. Her 2022 vote for Brett Kavanaugh has become a central issue, with opponents and voters revisiting her assurances that Roe v. Wade would remain settled law. Coverage from Spectrum News and PBS highlights how the abortion decision continues to shape her race.
- 14Justice Alito steps aside from major Supreme Court climate case▼Alito bows out of blockbuster Supreme Court climate case
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. His withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting the outcome. The reason for the recusal has not been detailed in the available reporting.
- 15Justice Alito recuses from climate case over oil holdings●Justice Alito recuses self from climate change case after complaints over his oil and gas holdings
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a climate change case after complaints were raised about his financial holdings in oil and gas companies. The recusal means he will not take part in the court's consideration of the dispute, which touches on matters central to climate litigation and energy industry interests.
- 16Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate suits case▼Alito recuses from case that could toss climate suits against oil companies
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine whether climate lawsuits against major oil companies move forward. The case is seen as pivotal for dozens of state and local governments seeking damages from energy companies over climate change. Alito gave no public explanation for stepping aside, and his absence leaves the court with eight justices weighing the dispute.
- 17Justice Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate case●Justice Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the Court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves eight justices to hear the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. No reason for the recusal was given, and the development is drawing attention to how the vacancy-free but shorthanded bench may handle one of its most consequential environmental rulings.
- 18Justice Alito steps aside from Supreme Court oil companies climate case●US Supreme Court’s Alito won’t participate in climate case involving oil companies
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a climate-related case involving oil companies, according to an announcement carried by US media. His recusal means the case will be heard by the remaining eight justices, potentially affecting its outcome. No detailed explanation for his decision not to participate was given in the report.
- 19Justice Alito recuses himself from landmark climate case●Supreme Court Justice Alito steps aside from landmark climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a landmark climate change case before the court. The recusal removes him from deliberations in one of the most consequential environmental disputes on the docket, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. The move is drawing attention given the case's potential impact on US climate regulation.
- 20US Sanctions Against ICC Raise European Sovereignty Fears●New U.S. sanctions against the ICC threaten European sovereignty
New US sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court are being framed as a threat to European sovereignty, since the Hague-based court sits in the Netherlands and depends on European cooperation. The measures could complicate EU support for international justice and raise questions about how Europe responds to US pressure on institutions it hosts and funds.
- 21Canada and allies push Afghanistan case at international court▼Two years ago, Canada and its allies moved to bring Afghanistan to the ICJ over persecution of women and girls. Now what?
Canada, together with the Netherlands and other allies, took the unprecedented step of initiating proceedings against Afghanistan at the International Court of Justice over the Taliban's systematic persecution of women and girls. Two years on, observers are asking what the case has achieved, as restrictions on Afghan women's education, work and public life continue and accountability through international legal channels remains slow and uncertain.
- 22Man sentenced to six years for bringing explosives to Red Mass church●Man gets 6 years in prison for taking explosives to church hosting annual Red Mass for justices
A man has been sentenced to six years in prison for bringing explosives into a church hosting the annual Red Mass, a ceremony traditionally held for judges and justices ahead of the new court term. The sentencing closes a case that raised alarm because of the event's close ties to the judiciary, and ABC News is among outlets covering the penalty handed down.
- 23Prosecutors seek four-year sentence for ex-minister Rachida Dati●Fin de partie pour Dati? Le PNF requiert une peine de quatre ans de prison, dont deux ans ferme sous bracelet électroniq
French national financial prosecutors have requested a four-year prison term for former justice minister Rachida Dati, including two years under electronic tagging, on charges of corruption and influence peddling. Prosecutors accuse her of a 'manifest affront to democracy', and commentators are asking whether the case marks the end of her political career.
- 24Supreme Court weighs major election cases as new term opens▼Supreme Court could take up these critical election cases as new term begins
The US Supreme Court is beginning its new term with several critical election-related cases potentially on its docket. Election law watchers say the justices could take up disputes over voting rules and election administration ahead of upcoming contests, with decisions likely to shape how future elections are run. Advocacy and legal groups are watching closely to see which cases the Court agrees to hear.
- 25
The Department of Justice is bringing in military attorneys to serve as prosecutors in California and New York, according to an ABA Journal report. The move would place Judge Advocate General corps lawyers into civilian federal prosecutorial roles in two of the country's largest legal markets, raising questions about the use of armed forces personnel in civilian law enforcement.
- 26UN pushes to restore justice in Mozambique's Cabo Delgado▼Restoring the justice system in conflict-affected Cabo Delgado, Mozambique
The UN human rights office is working to rebuild the justice system in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique, a province devastated by years of armed conflict. Courts, police and legal services were severely disrupted as violence displaced hundreds of thousands. The initiative aims to restore access to justice and the rule of law for returning communities.
- 27Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court's Shadow Docket Practices▼Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Getting Tired of the Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket Abuses
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has voiced growing frustration with the court's use of its shadow docket — urgent, often unsigned rulings issued without full briefing or oral argument. Her criticism adds to ongoing debate over the court's transparency, with critics arguing the practice lets major decisions avoid standard procedural scrutiny.
- 28Kosovo lawmakers denounce EU-backed court's war crimes verdicts●Kosovo's lawmakers slam EU-backed court's war crimes verdicts of rebel leaders from war with Serbia
Kosovo's parliament has publicly criticised the EU-backed court in The Hague after it convicted former leaders of the Kosovo Liberation Army, the ethnic Albanian guerrilla force that fought Serbian forces in the 1998-99 war. Many lawmakers view the verdicts as an injustice against men widely regarded at home as heroes of the independence struggle.
- 29Commentary blames Roberts court for reviving Jim Crow-era policies▼Jim Crow was on the ash heap of history. Then came the Roberts court.
A commentary argues that Jim Crow segregation had been consigned to history until the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts began dismantling legal protections, in the outlet's view reopening the door to racially discriminatory practices. The piece reflects ongoing criticism from the left of the court's rulings on voting rights and affirmative action, and reignited debate over the judiciary's role in civil rights.
- 30Supreme Court justice overturns colleague's election-court ruling▼Supreme Court justice overturns colleague’s election-court ruling
A justice on Brazil's Supreme Court has reversed a ruling issued by a fellow member of the court sitting on the electoral tribunal, according to Valor International. The decision affects an election-court matter, though details of which ruling was overturned and its practical consequences have not been made clear. Rulings of this kind typically shape electoral disputes and candidate eligibility cases.
- 31Berkeley report calls for world court review of Mexico under López Obrador●Berkeley report urges world court review of Mexico under López Obrador
A report by the University of California, Berkeley is urging the International Court of Justice to review Mexico's conduct under former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador. The document reportedly raises concerns about governance and rule of law during his 2018-2024 administration. The call is drawing attention to how López Obrador's legacy is being judged internationally as Claudia Sheinbaum's government continues his political movement.
- 32
The US Supreme Court's summer recess has been far from quiet, with the justices continuing to issue emergency orders and significant rulings well into the traditional off-season. Legal observers note the court's increasingly active 'shadow docket' has eroded the long-standing pattern of a slow summer, keeping the institution in the headlines between terms.
- 33Justice Alito Recuses From Supreme Court Suncor Climate Case●Justice Alito Recuses From Suncor Climate Case at Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the Suncor climate liability case, removing himself from the high-profile dispute over oil company responsibility for climate change damages. The case against Suncor Energy is one of several climate lawsuits working through US courts. Alito has not publicly explained the reason for his recusal, and his absence could affect the outcome if the court splits.
- 34Trump criticizes Supreme Court over Missouri map ruling▼Trump slams Supreme Court for blocking Missouri’s GOP-favored map for third time
President Trump has publicly criticized the Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The dispute centers on GOP efforts to redraw the state's districts to their advantage, with the court repeatedly refusing to allow the new boundaries to take effect. Trump blasted the justices' decision, intensifying tensions between the White House and a court he appointed a majority of, and keeping redistricting fights in the national spotlight.
- 35
A preview of the US Supreme Court's 2026–2027 term is drawing attention, laying out the major cases and legal questions the justices are expected to take up in the session beginning in October 2026. Commentary so far focuses on what the docket could mean for constitutional law and for the Court's current conservative majority.
- 36Trump Moves to Sanction and Dismantle the International Criminal Court▼Trump Ramps Up Bid to Dismantle International Criminal Court
The Trump administration is preparing new sanctions against the International Criminal Court as part of an escalating effort to undermine the Hague-based tribunal, the Wall Street Journal reports. The move escalates a long-running conflict between Washington and the court, which has pursued cases involving US allies and American personnel. Critics see it as an attack on international justice, while supporters argue the court overreaches against the United States.
- 37US lawyer who prosecuted Nazi death squads at Nuremberg remembered●'No one showed any sign of remorse': The heroic US lawyer who put Nazi death squad members on trial at Nuremberg On 29 S
The story recounts Ben Ferencz, the American lawyer who served as chief prosecutor in the Einsatzgruppen trial at Nuremberg, which began on 29 September 1947 and became known as the biggest murder trial in history. Ferencz, who was 27 at the time, brought 22 members of Nazi mobile killing squads to justice. In interviews he recalled that none of the defendants showed any remorse for their role in the mass killings.
- 38New podcast examines Russia's abduction of children in Oleshky●The first episode of our @ trpforjustice podcast, with @ bylinetimes.bsky.social Prior to Russia's starvation of Oleshky
The Rights and Practice for Justice project has launched a podcast series, opening with an episode produced with Byline Times about occupied Oleshky in Ukraine's Kherson region. The episode documents that before Russia's blockade of aid led to starvation in the flooded city, Russian forces were abducting Ukrainian children, tracing the practice from Milošević's era to Putin's.
- 39Justice criticizes Supreme Court's emergency docket practices●Justice criticizes Supreme Court’s use of emergency docket
A sitting justice has publicly criticized the Supreme Court's expanding use of its emergency, or shadow, docket, where major decisions are issued without full briefing or signed opinions. The comments add to ongoing debate among judges and legal scholars over transparency in how the nation's highest court handles urgent cases.
- 40Trump Slams Supreme Court Over Missouri Gerrymandering Ruling▼Trump slams Supreme Court for rejecting Missouri gerrymander
Donald Trump criticized the Supreme Court after it declined to back Missouri's congressional redistricting plan, which critics called a partisan gerrymander. The rebuke puts Trump at odds with a court that includes three of his own appointees, and the decision leaves Missouri's existing district map in place ahead of upcoming elections. Reaction has focused on the tension between Trump and the conservative-majority court over election mapmaking.