search
Justice For All
Trends
- 1
Demands are mounting for the US government to release the full files connected to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in federal custody in 2019. Commenters are pressing lawmakers and the Justice Department to disclose names and documents, amid ongoing public suspicion that powerful figures linked to Epstein have been shielded from accountability.
- 2Elizabeth Holmes reportedly set for halfway house transfer next yearβTheranos founder reportedly to be transferred to halfway home next year
Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes is reportedly due to be moved from prison to a halfway home next year, according to a Guardian report. Holmes is serving a sentence for fraud over the failed blood-testing startup. The news is drawing renewed discussion about her case, her sentencing, and how the justice system handles high-profile white-collar offenders.
- 3Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate caseβAlito recuses from major climate change case to be decided by the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case pending before the court. With eight justices instead of nine, the outcome could end in a 4-4 tie, which would leave the lower court's ruling in place without setting a national precedent. No reason for the recusal has been given, and observers are watching closely for what it may signal about the case's wider implications.
- 4Justice Alito Steps Aside From Climate Change DisputeβJustice Alito will no longer participate in climate change dispute
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change dispute before the court. His withdrawal means the case will be heard by only eight justices, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place without a binding national precedent. The court has not detailed the reason for his recusal, and observers are weighing its potential impact on how the climate case is ultimately resolved.
- 5Justice Alito Recuses Himself From Major Climate CaseβIn reversal, Justice Samuel Alito steps aside from major climate case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate case, reversing an earlier decision to take part in it. The move comes as the court weighs disputes with significant consequences for climate regulation. Little further detail is available about his reasons or the specific case involved, and reaction so far is limited to initial news reports.
- 6Trump plan to weaken Endangered Species Act cites 1995 Scalia dissentβTrump's sneaky plan to gut Endangered Species Act draws from 1995 Scalia dissent
The Trump administration is pursuing changes that would significantly weaken the Endangered Species Act, and the legal strategy reportedly draws on Justice Antonin Scalia's 1995 dissent, which argued for a narrower reading of the law's habitat protections. Critics call the approach a stealth effort to gut protections for at-risk wildlife, while supporters frame it as reining in regulatory overreach.
- 7Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate CaseβJustice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate-Change Case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was due to be heard, according to the New York Times. The move is notable because recusals by Supreme Court justices are rare, and Alito's absence could affect the court's balance in a case with far-reaching implications for climate regulation.
- 8Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate caseβJustice Samuel Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the Court, according to CNN. The move leaves the remaining eight justices to decide a case with potentially far-reaching consequences for US climate policy. No reason for the recusal was given in the report, and it is not yet clear how his absence might affect the outcome.
- 9Justice Alito recuses himself from major climate caseβAlito steps aside in a major climate case after scrutiny over oil stock holdings
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has removed himself from a major climate-related case following scrutiny over his holdings of oil company stock. The recusal comes amid criticism of his financial disclosures and renewed debate over ethics rules for Supreme Court justices and potential conflicts of interest in cases touching the energy industry.
- 10Justice Alito steps aside from major Supreme Court climate caseβSupreme Court Justice Alito will not participate in big climate change case next week
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case set for arguments next week. The court did not give a reason for his absence in the announcement reported by CNBC. His recusal leaves eight justices to hear the case, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place without setting national precedent.
- 11Justice Alito steps aside from Supreme Court climate case against oil companiesβUS Supreme Court's Alito won't participate in climate case involving oil companies
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a climate case involving major oil companies, according to Reuters. His recusal means the case will be heard by eight justices, potentially raising the chance of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place without a binding national precedent.
- 12Justice Alito steps aside from major Supreme Court climate caseβAlito bows out of blockbuster Supreme Court climate case
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. His withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting the outcome. The reason for the recusal has not been detailed in the available reporting.
- 13Justice Alito Sits Out Supreme Court Climate CaseβJustice Alito Wonβt Participate in Supreme Court Case on Climate Change
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending Supreme Court case concerning climate change, according to a Wall Street Journal report. His recusal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially raising the stakes for any split ruling. The reasons for his decision to step aside have not been detailed in the report.
- 14Justice Alito recuses from pivotal climate change caseβAlito will not participate in pivotal climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a closely watched climate change case before the court, according to a report from The Center Square. His absence could affect the outcome, since an 8-justice court raises the possibility of a tie vote, which would leave the lower court ruling in place without setting a national precedent.
- 15Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate suits caseβAlito recuses from case that could toss climate suits against oil companies
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine whether climate lawsuits against major oil companies move forward. The case is seen as pivotal for dozens of state and local governments seeking damages from energy companies over climate change. Alito gave no public explanation for stepping aside, and his absence leaves the court with eight justices weighing the dispute.
- 16Justice Alito recuses himself from landmark climate caseβSupreme Court Justice Alito steps aside from landmark climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a landmark climate change case before the court. The recusal removes him from deliberations in one of the most consequential environmental disputes on the docket, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. The move is drawing attention given the case's potential impact on US climate regulation.
- 17Justice Alito recuses from major climate caseβJustice Alito recuses from major climate-change case to be heard next week
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case scheduled to be argued next week. The move means the case will be heard by the remaining eight justices, and Alito has not given a public reason for stepping aside. The recusal is drawing attention because the case is one of the most significant environmental matters on the court's docket.
- 18Justice Alito Recuses Himself from Major Supreme Court Climate CaseβSamuel Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves the justices potentially split eight ways on a dispute with significant implications for US climate policy. No detailed reason for the recusal has been widely reported, and observers are watching closely to see how the case will proceed without him.
- 19Justice Alito Recuses From Climate Case Ahead of New TermβJustice Alito surprisingly recuses from climate change case ahead of new term
Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a climate change case set to come before the Supreme Court, a surprise move ahead of the new term. The decision means the case will be heard by only eight justices, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. Alito has not given a public reason for stepping aside, and observers are speculating about whether it relates to ethics concerns that have followed several justices in recent months.
- 20Justice Alito recuses himself from Boulder climate lawsuitβJustice Alito recuses himself from major Boulder climate lawsuit
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate lawsuit brought by the City of Boulder, Colorado, which seeks damages from energy companies over climate-related costs. The move, reported by Colorado Public Radio, could affect the case's outcome, as recusals leave eight justices to decide whether the court takes it up.
- 21NC court system has yet to report data breach to state DOJβCourt system hasnβt notified NCDOJ of data breach that exposed peopleβs private info
North Carolina's court system has not notified the state Department of Justice about a data breach that exposed people's private information. Under state law, organizations must alert the NCDOJ of breaches affecting residents, so the silence is raising questions about compliance and how many people's data was compromised.