Lima

A full speech by Balen Shah, described as Nepal's Prime Minister, addressing the UN General Assembly on climate change and delivering a message for Nepal in 2026 is circulating widely and drawing large audiences. In the address he is said to spotlight Nepal's climate concerns on the world stage. The focus is on what his climate message means for the country and the global climate debate.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending Supreme Court case concerning climate change. No reason for his recusal was given. His absence leaves eight justices to hear the case, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. The development draws attention because climate litigation before the Court carries major regulatory consequences.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate-change case just days before it was due to be heard, according to a New York Times report. The recusal of a justice at the last minute from such a consequential case is highly unusual, and it remains unclear what prompted the decision or how it will affect the court's handling of the dispute.

World leaders, citing climate change as an existential threat, are demanding that the United Nations function effectively on the issue. The call reflects frustration among governments over stalled international climate action and the UN's struggles to deliver coordinated global responses to warming, extreme weather and rising sea levels affecting member states.

The Trump administration is moving to roll back clean car regulations that were designed to reduce climate-warming emissions from vehicles. The plan would weaken emissions standards for cars and light trucks, reversing one of the flagship US climate policies of recent years. Environmental groups are expected to oppose the move, while automakers face uncertainty over which rules will apply.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the report, but his withdrawal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially increasing the chance of a split ruling on an issue with far-reaching environmental and regulatory consequences.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to reports from USA Today and the Detroit Free Press. The move means the remaining eight justices will decide the landmark litigation. His withdrawal is drawing attention because recusals at the Supreme Court are rare and the case could shape US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change case before the court. The announcement, reported by SCOTUSblog, removes one justice from a dispute with potential consequences for climate regulation, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. Reasons for the withdrawal were not stated in the report.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending climate change case, according to multiple US news outlets. No reason for his recusal was given in the reports. His absence could affect the outcome of the case, which is seen as pivotal for climate-related litigation and regulation in the United States.

Scientists are developing new ways to control mosquitoes, the animal that kills more people than any other on Earth. As the climate warms, mosquito seasons are growing longer, giving the insects more time to spread dangerous diseases such as malaria and dengue. Reports highlight how extended warm periods are expanding the threat to new regions and prompting research into novel control methods.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case when it is heard next week. The case is one of the most significant climate-related disputes to reach the Court, and his absence leaves eight justices to decide it, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. No reason for his non-participation has been given in the announcement.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate case, reversing an earlier decision to take part. The move comes amid scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest surrounding the justice. The reversal is drawing attention to ethical questions facing the Supreme Court and to the stakes of the climate litigation, which could have significant consequences for environmental regulation in the United States.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate case amid scrutiny over his holdings in oil stocks. The decision removes him from proceedings with potentially far-reaching consequences for climate regulation, and it has renewed debate over the ethical standards and financial disclosure rules governing Supreme Court justices.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

The International Union for Conservation of Nature used the UN General Assembly and New York Climate Week to advance its agenda on nature protection, ocean conservation and climate action. The organisation says the gatherings offered a key moment to push for stronger commitments linking biodiversity and climate policy ahead of upcoming global negotiations.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

An India News live broadcast is tracking climate change and weather developments in Mumbai, asking on air whether destruction has begun in the city. The Hindi-language question mark framing suggests heavy rain, flooding or extreme weather affecting Mumbai, and the broadcast is drawing large audiences following the coverage. Viewers are watching for updates on conditions in the city and across India.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

New reporting from researchers, including work covered by the Natural History Museum and Phys.org, suggests shifting climate conditions could change the risks humans face from deadly rodent-borne diseases. Changes in temperature and rainfall may alter rodent habitats and populations, potentially bringing infected animals into closer contact with people and expanding where diseases like hantavirus and Lassa fever pose a threat.

Storms linked to the El Niño weather pattern are tearing away large chunks of the California coastline, according to reporting in The Atlantic. The article examines how intensifying ocean storms are accelerating coastal erosion, costing communities land and infrastructure along the Pacific shore. The story is being shared widely across environmental and science-focused audiences as extreme weather linked to climate patterns draws renewed attention.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine the fate of climate lawsuits brought by states and municipalities against major oil companies. Without giving a reason, Alito's removal leaves eight justices to weigh whether the suits, which seek damages for climate change harms, can proceed. The outcome could reshape how oil companies are held accountable for emissions, making the case one of the most consequential climate-related matters to reach the high court.

Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino addressed the World Leaders Forum at Columbia University, discussing Panama's sovereignty, migration and climate change. His remarks come as the Panama Canal, migration through the Darién Gap and climate pressures remain central issues in US-Panama relations, drawing attention to how the small Central American nation navigates major global powers and environmental challenges.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the court's consideration of the Suncor climate liability case, which involves Colorado communities suing the energy company over climate change damages. The move leaves eight justices to decide whether to hear the dispute, and is drawing attention because of questions over Alito's financial disclosures and ties to energy interests.