search
SAVE ruling
Trends
- 1Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for voter citizenship checks●Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows states to cross-check voter registration records against immigration data, a step several Republican-led states have sought as part of efforts to tighten election integrity rules. Critics argue the practice could disenfranchise eligible voters, while supporters say it safeguards the ballot.
- 2Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks Before Midterms●Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks via SAVE Database Before Midterms
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to verify voter citizenship using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters say protects election integrity and critics warn could purge eligible voters and discourage registration among naturalized citizens just before voting begins.
- 3Trump Administration Moves To Weaken Key 401(K) Protection▼Trump Administration Looks To Soften Vital 401(K) Protection
The Trump administration is reportedly looking to soften a vital protection for 401(k) retirement accounts, according to a Forbes report. The reported change touches a safeguard considered important for American workers' retirement savings. Details of which rule is targeted and how it would be changed have not been laid out, and the full scope of the proposal remains unclear.
- 4Laver Cup tiebreak sparks debate on tennis momentum▼The Laver Cup’s tiebreak and the magic of tennis momentum with players points from disaster
The Laver Cup's tiebreak format is drawing attention after matches in which players recovered from seemingly lost positions, reviving discussion about how momentum shifts work in tennis. Commentary, including in the New York Times, focuses on how the team event's scoring rules create dramatic swings and let players turn around points and sets that once appeared beyond saving.