Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters, in a decision reported by CyberScoop. The ruling lets states tap the immigration-status system as part of voter roll checks, a move likely to intensify debate over election integrity measures and the treatment of eligible citizens during verification.

The US Supreme Court has ruled against the bulk of President Trump's tariffs, invalidating most of the import duties imposed under his trade agenda. The decision marks a major legal setback for the administration's economic policy and is set to reshape US trade relations, with reactions pouring in from lawmakers, businesses and trading partners worldwide.

A Supreme Court ruling concerning a disputed election may come into conflict with state law, according to reporting by Honolulu Civil Beat. The potential clash raises questions about how election disputes would be resolved and which legal authority would prevail. No further details about the specific ruling, the state involved, or the reaction from officials are available at this time.

Following the Supreme Court's sweeping ruling on presidential immunity, Donald Trump is invoking it broadly as he seeks to expand executive power. The decision, which shielded official presidential acts from prosecution, is being used by Trump to justify a wide range of actions, drawing concern from critics who warn it undermines checks and balances and fuels debate over the limits of presidential authority.

The South Carolina Supreme Court has overturned the murder convictions of Alex Murdaugh, the disbarred lawyer previously found guilty of killing his wife Maggie and son Paul in 2021. The ruling throws out the 2023 verdicts, and attention now turns to whether prosecutors will retry him in the double-murder case.

The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting. The decision blocks efforts to impose limits on the use of mailed ballots, preserving broader access to absentee voting for now. The ruling touches one of the most contested issues in American election policy, following years of litigation over voting rules.

Donald Trump said 'too bad' after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, and is now pushing for legislation to end the practice. The former president has long sought to eliminate automatic citizenship for children born in the US to non-citizens, and is calling on lawmakers to act where the courts would not.

The Supreme Court has allowed the Department of Homeland Security to proceed with an overhaul of its immigration database ahead of the midterm elections, over the dissents of the Court's liberal justices. The decision lifts a block on the DHS plan, which critics warn could affect immigration records used in voter-related checks, while supporters argue it is a routine modernization effort.

US news outlets are examining how recent Supreme Court decisions may influence the upcoming midterm elections. Coverage from stations including KCRA and KOCO focuses on the potential electoral consequences of the rulings, particularly how they could mobilize voters and shape campaign messaging for both parties heading into the vote.

Utah officials say they will not use former president Donald Trump's voter-fraud database to purge the state's voter registration lists, even after a Supreme Court ruling that opened the door to such removals. The decision, reported by The Salt Lake Tribune, positions Utah against efforts by allies of the president to challenge voter rolls nationally, and it is drawing attention in the ongoing debate over election integrity and voting rights.

The California Supreme Court has ruled that a county sheriff acted illegally when he seized roughly 650,000 ballots, and has ordered that they be returned. The decision is being covered internationally, including in Ukrainian-language media, and is expected to intensify debate over election security, law enforcement authority, and the handling of ballots in a US election.

The US Supreme Court has once again blocked the use of a Republican-favored congressional map in Missouri, rejecting the state's redrawn district boundaries. It is at least the second time the justices have intervened over the map. The ruling reignites debate over partisan gerrymandering and voting rights, with Republicans in Missouri pushing for districts that favor their party and critics welcoming the court's refusal to allow the map to stand.

A dispute over Missouri's congressional map has led the Supreme Court to issue a clarification of the Purcell principle, the doctrine limiting courts' ability to change election rules close to an election. Commentators say the episode also exposed flaws in the Court's shadow docket practice, where major decisions are made through brief, unsigned orders with limited reasoning and little public scrutiny.

The Supreme Court has upheld the demotion of a police officer who was disciplined for harassment, confirming the penalty handed down against him. The ruling settles the dispute over the punishment and reinforces that harassment within the force can justify career-level demotion. Reactions are likely to focus on accountability in law enforcement and the standards for disciplining officers over misconduct toward colleagues or the public.

A federal appeals court has sided with Hawaii's requirement that gun permit applicants complete the process within a set window and submit to inspection mandates. The ruling keeps in place provisions that gun rights advocates have challenged as burdensome, while state officials argue they are necessary for public safety. The decision is likely to fuel ongoing legal battles over the reach of Second Amendment protections following recent Supreme Court rulings on firearms rights.

The Montana Supreme Court has changed its position on a ballot initiative in Butte concerning a proposed data center, reversing an earlier stance on whether the measure can move forward. The ruling affects local efforts to put the data center question before voters, and the turnaround has drawn attention in the region as residents and officials assess what the decision means for the project and the community.

The Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning the Department of Homeland Security's voter database, and officials have confirmed it will have no impact on California's 2026 general election. The decision resolves questions about whether federal voter data access could affect how the state runs its elections. California's electoral procedures for 2026 will proceed as planned.