US courts

The Dutch government is preparing for potentially devastating US sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court, which is headquartered in The Hague. The measures, linked to the Trump administration's objections to the court's work, including its Israel-related cases, could disrupt the tribunal's operations and its banking and diplomatic support in the Netherlands.

The US Supreme Court has invalidated most of the tariffs imposed under President Trump, according to ABC News. The ruling strikes at the core of the administration's trade policy, which used sweeping import duties as a central economic and political tool. Details of the court's reasoning and the administration's response are not yet available.

A US judge has overturned President Trump's ban on certain media outlets from White House coverage. The ruling blocks the administration from excluding journalists from presidential events, a move critics called an attack on press freedom. Supporters of the president are expected to challenge the decision, and the case is likely to move through the appeals courts, keeping the fight over media access in the spotlight.

Immigrants have asked the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that blocks the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The filing asks the justices not to disturb the current stay while litigation continues over whether people can be removed to countries that are not their own. The case is a fresh flashpoint in the broader legal fight over the administration's aggressive deportation policies.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows state officials to cross-check voter registration records against the immigration database, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Critics argue such checks risk wrongly purging eligible voters, particularly naturalised citizens, while supporters frame the ruling as a victory for election integrity.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the initial reports. His absence could affect the outcome, as the remaining eight justices may split on an issue that has previously divided the Court along ideological lines.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to the New York Times. The decision removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate policy, raising questions about how the remaining eight justices might divide and why the recusal came so late.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has reversed course and stepped aside from a major climate case, removing himself from the panel that would decide the dispute. No detailed explanation accompanied the announcement. The move could affect the outcome, since an eighth justice participating raises the odds of a 4-4 split, and it comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the justices' ethics and potential conflicts of interest.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case when it is heard next week. The case is one of the most significant climate-related disputes to reach the Court, and his absence leaves eight justices to decide it, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. No reason for his non-participation has been given in the announcement.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has voiced support for the International Criminal Court after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the Court and its staff. The move puts Berlin at odds with Washington over the Hague-based tribunal, which the US penalises in connection with its investigations, including warrants targeting Israeli officials.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate case amid scrutiny over his oil stock holdings. The move comes after questions were raised about whether his financial interests in oil companies created a conflict of interest in the litigation. The withdrawal could affect the outcome of a closely watched climate dispute, and it has intensified debate over ethics rules and disclosure standards for Supreme Court justices.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case before the court. The decision removes one justice from a ruling that could shape how climate-related claims are handled in the United States, and observers are watching closely for what his absence means for the outcome.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a landmark climate change case before the court. News outlets including USA Today and the Detroit Free Press reported his decision to step aside, though neither report detailed his reasons or which case is involved. His absence could affect the outcome, leaving potentially eight justices to decide a matter with major implications for climate regulation.

The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use a federal database to verify the citizenship of voter registration applicants. The decision, reported by Route Fifty, clears the way for expanded vetting ahead of the midterm elections, though analysts say its practical effect on the upcoming contests will be limited because implementation timelines and coverage constraints restrict how widely the tool can be applied.

A US court has ordered Apple to pay $5.7 billion for infringing a haptics patent used in the iPhone and Apple Watch. The ruling, one of the largest patent damages awards against the company, covers the vibration technology behind its devices' tactile feedback. It is expected to draw appeals and renewed scrutiny of Apple's licensing practices.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case scheduled to be heard next week, according to the Washington Times. The recusal means the remaining eight justices will decide a dispute with significant implications for climate regulation. No reason for the step-aside was given in the report, and it is not yet clear how his absence might affect the outcome or the court's ruling.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the pending case brought by Colorado municipalities against energy company Suncor over climate-related damages. The case tests whether state consumer-protection and nuisance claims against fossil fuel producers belong in state courts. With only eight justices participating, the outcome could end in a 4-4 split, leaving lower-court rulings in place.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not hear a major case that could affect his personal investments in oil and gas companies. The decision means the case will go forward without him, leaving the remaining eight justices to decide an issue in which Alito holds a disclosed financial stake.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico have asked a federal judge to stop President Trump from reviving a ban on their reporters' access to the White House. The news organisations are seeking a court order to preserve their access, arguing the move restricts press freedom. The dispute reopens a running battle between the administration and major US news outlets over media access.

Germany's foreign minister visited the International Criminal Court in The Hague, pledging Berlin's full support for the institution despite US sanctions imposed under the Trump administration. The visit signals Germany's continued commitment to international justice, though it comes after Berlin also announced its own sanctions targeting ICC officials, creating a mixed picture of Europe's stance toward the court.

The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's redrawn congressional map for the third time, halting the gerrymandered district boundaries from taking effect while challenges continue. The repeated interventions keep Missouri's current congressional seats in place for now. The ruling is drawing attention from voting rights advocates and state officials locked in a dispute over partisan redistricting in the state.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has removed himself from a major climate-related case following scrutiny over his holdings of oil company stock. The recusal comes amid criticism of his financial disclosures and renewed debate over ethics rules for Supreme Court justices and potential conflicts of interest in cases touching the energy industry.

North Carolina officials have welcomed a US Supreme Court ruling concerning voter citizenship verification requirements. The decision touches on the ongoing national debate over election integrity and who may be required to prove citizenship when registering to vote. Supporters view it as a win for ballot security measures, while critics warn such checks can burden eligible voters. Details of the ruling's wider impact remain limited.

Kurt Olsen, a lawyer who worked to challenge the 2020 US election results on behalf of Donald Trump, has left the Justice Department. Olsen had been serving at the department and was known for pursuing election fraud claims that courts repeatedly rejected. His departure is drawing attention from critics of Trump's efforts to overturn the election and from observers tracking political influence inside the department.