US federal regulators

A coalition of US states and cities has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's Environmental Protection Agency over its repeal of emissions rules. The legal challenge contests the rollback of climate and air pollution regulations, framing the repeal as unlawful and harmful to public health and climate efforts. The case adds to a broader pattern of litigation between Democratic-led states and the administration over environmental policy.

Fast Company reports on what the leaders of the biggest artificial intelligence companies are seeking from US policymakers. The piece examines the industry's policy agenda in Washington, as AI firms push for regulatory frameworks, federal support, and rules that shape how the technology develops. Discussion centers on the growing influence of AI executives on government decision-making.

The chair of the US Federal Trade Commission has argued that companies developing AI agents should be held legally responsible for what those systems do, pushing back against treating AI agents as independent actors. The comments, reported by Reuters, signal a harder regulatory line on who bears the blame when autonomous AI tools cause harm, and have sparked debate among developers, lawyers and tech industry watchers.

President Trump is set to appoint Jay Clayton, the former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, as the White House's top artificial intelligence official, according to the New York Times. The move would place a securities regulator-turned-prosecutor in charge of coordinating federal AI policy, drawing attention from both technology and government watchers.

The US Supreme Court is hearing a major climate-related case, and analysts are laying out the key questions to follow as arguments unfold. Coverage is focusing on how the justices may rule, what the decision could mean for federal climate regulation, and the broader implications for environmental policy in the United States. Observers on both sides are watching closely given the court's conservative majority.

Democratic state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency over its repeal of rules limiting power plant emissions. The suit challenges the Trump administration's rollback of regulations designed to curb pollution from fossil fuel plants. The legal fight is expected to become a major test of federal authority to regulate greenhouse gases and could shape US climate policy for years.

A group of US states has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the Trump administration's rollback of emissions regulations for power plants. The legal challenge argues the retreat undermines federal efforts to curb pollution and climate change from the power sector. The move sets up another court battle over environmental policy and the scope of federal authority to regulate greenhouse gases.

A coalition of US states and cities has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's Environmental Protection Agency over its repeal of emissions rules. The legal challenge targets the rollback of regulations designed to limit pollution, with plaintiffs arguing the repeal unlawfully undermines environmental protections. The case sets up another court battle over federal climate policy.

The US Supreme Court is being urged to take up a case that could shut down climate-related lawsuits filed by states and municipalities against energy companies. Critics argue these claims are legally flawed because they seek to regulate emissions through state tort law rather than federal policy. Supporters of the suits say the companies should be held accountable for damages linked to their products. The case has drawn wide attention from legal, energy and climate policy observers.

A coalition of US states and cities has filed a lawsuit against federal agencies over weakened vehicle fuel economy standards. The challenge argues that rolling back fuel efficiency requirements harms efforts to cut emissions and address climate change. The case adds to the growing list of legal battles between Democratic-led states and the federal government over environmental deregulation.

The US National Institutes of Health has awarded a $2 million grant to fund research into how the brain detects protein intake. The project aims to uncover the mechanisms behind protein sensing, a topic of growing interest in nutrition science given protein's role in appetite regulation and health. Details on the receiving institution and researchers were not included in the initial coverage.

A group of US states has filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's repeal of federal climate regulations for power plants. The rollback removed limits on greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector, a cornerstone of US climate policy. The legal fight sets Democratic-led states against the federal government and is expected to work through the courts for years, with major consequences for US emissions policy.

A coalition of states and cities has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's Environmental Protection Agency after it eliminated a rule limiting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. The plaintiffs argue the repeal abandons federal obligations to curb pollution from one of the largest sources of US carbon emissions, setting up a fresh legal battle over climate regulation.

A US federal appeals court has issued a unanimous decision concerning suppressors and the National Firearms Act, with commentators arguing the ruling came down immediately after what they call a deliberate attempt to trap bad precedent. Gun-rights analysts are now debating what the decision means for future challenges to federal firearms regulation and whether it signals broader limits on federal authority over silencers.

Health Affairs examines a long-standing gap in US health benefits law: when ERISA preempts state insurance regulation, oversight shifts to federal authorities that Congress has never adequately funded to do the job. The piece argues that employers' self-funded health plans operate with far weaker regulatory scrutiny than state-regulated insurance, leaving gaps in consumer protection and accountability that policymakers have yet to address.

President Trump is expected to appoint Jay Clayton, the former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman currently serving as US attorney in Manhattan, as the White House's top artificial intelligence adviser. The reported pick would place a securities lawyer and enforcement veteran in a role central to shaping federal AI policy, drawing attention to how the administration intends to regulate and promote the fast-growing technology.

A federal court has issued a ruling in the case challenging how the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded through the Federal Reserve. The dispute centers on whether the bureau's financing structure is constitutional, an issue with wide implications for the agency's operations and the industries it regulates. Industry groups and legal observers are watching closely for details of the ruling and its next steps on appeal.

The US Federal Communications Commission is continuing its deregulation agenda, with moves touching environmental regulations and the release of additional spectrum for commercial use. The approach signals the agency's intent to reduce regulatory burdens on telecommunications and satellite operators while opening more radio frequencies, a step closely watched by the space and communications industries.

The Federal Reserve has finalized changes to its bank stress-test regime, locking in revisions to how the largest US lenders are evaluated for capital resilience. The move follows industry pressure and public comment over proposals to smooth volatility in test results and adjust scenarios. Banks and regulators are weighing what the final rules mean for capital buffers and future planning.

Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal has introduced a legislative framework that would establish a national charter system to regulate artificial intelligence in the United States. The proposal aims to rein in AI development through federal oversight. Details beyond the announcement are limited so far, and reaction from lawmakers, industry and the public is still emerging.

The US Federal Trade Commission has opened an investigation into leading artificial intelligence companies, including Anthropic and OpenAI. The probe targets the AI giants' practices as regulators step up scrutiny of the fast-growing sector. Details of the FTC's specific concerns and potential outcomes have not yet been made clear.

A ProMarket piece argues that US state governments have the tools to slow down artificial intelligence development on their own, without relying on the federal government. It suggests state-level regulation could meaningfully shape or restrain AI deployment. The argument lands amid ongoing national debate over whether Washington is moving too slowly on AI oversight, and whether states should fill the gap with their own rules.

The US Federal Trade Commission has launched a broad investigation into artificial intelligence companies Anthropic and OpenAI, the makers of leading chatbots Claude and ChatGPT. The probe signals growing regulatory scrutiny of the AI sector in Washington. Details of the inquiry's specific focus have not yet been made fully public.

A group of US lawmakers is arguing that Congress should step in to regulate artificial intelligence. The debate centres on whether federal legislation is needed to set rules for how AI systems are developed and used, an issue that has divided officials in Washington and is being weighed as the technology spreads rapidly across industries.

Consumer advocacy group Public Citizen has filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission alleging that commercials paid for by the US government promoting Donald Trump violate federal anti-propaganda laws. The group is calling on regulators to order broadcasters to stop airing the spots, arguing that taxpayer-funded political advertising is unlawful.

ExxonMobil and Suncor Energy have petitioned the US Supreme Court to intervene in climate liability lawsuits filed against them. The companies want the justices to block state and municipal claims seeking damages for climate change costs, arguing the suits are an attempt to regulate emissions through the courts. The move escalates a long-running legal fight over whether such cases belong in state or federal court.

The US General Services Administration has issued a new policy governing how artificial intelligence is procured in new federal contracts. The guidance lays out requirements agencies must follow when acquiring AI tools and services. The full details of the policy were reported by FedScoop, and the move is drawing attention as the federal government moves to standardize how it buys AI technology.

The watchdog group Better Markets is highlighting how Supreme Court rulings shape the US economy and the financial wellbeing of ordinary Americans. The group argues the Court's decisions on regulation and corporate accountability reach far beyond legal circles, affecting wages, consumer protections and Main Street businesses. The analysis is prompting discussion about how much power the justices wield over everyday economic life.

New Mexico's attorney general and a state lawmaker have announced an effort to regulate AI models they describe as rogue. The announcement signals a legislative push to impose oversight on powerful artificial intelligence systems, joining a growing list of US states moving to address AI risks without waiting for federal action.

The US Supreme Court is set to begin its new term by hearing a significant environmental case. The case is expected to draw wide attention because of its potential impact on federal environmental regulation. Observers are watching to see how the court's current majority approaches environmental questions in its upcoming docket.

Around 60 million US children are set to be enrolled automatically in new 'Trump Accounts', the federally backed savings accounts created under recent legislation, without families needing to apply. Regulators are now working out the enrollment rules and how the accounts will be funded and managed. Coverage is focused on what the automatic rollout means for parents and the practical details still to be settled.

The Federal Trade Commission has opened an investigation into OpenAI, Anthropic and other artificial intelligence companies over potential consumer and safety risks posed by their products. The move marks one of the most significant US regulatory actions yet against the leading AI developers, as regulators scrutinize whether chatbots and other AI tools may harm or mislead consumers.

Experts are calling on federal lawmakers in Washington to introduce binding regulation of artificial intelligence, warning that risks from the fast-moving technology are outpacing government action. Their appeal raises the question of whether Congress will act, amid ongoing debate in the United States over how to oversee AI development without stifling innovation.

A group of US states is legally challenging the Trump administration's repeal of a federal rule limiting pollution from power plants. The rollback lifts restrictions on emissions from fossil-fuel plants, and the states argue the repeal endangers public health and ignores the government's obligation to curb greenhouse gases. The dispute is expected to move through the courts, keeping power plant emissions policy at the center of the broader fight over US climate regulation.

The US Federal Trade Commission has launched a broad investigation into OpenAI and Anthropic, focusing on the risks posed by AI agents. The probe signals growing regulatory scrutiny of leading artificial intelligence companies and the safety of autonomous systems they deploy. The news is circulating widely among technology commentators.