search
US immigration courts
Trends
- 1Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for citizenship checksโผSupreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters, in a decision reported by CyberScoop. The ruling lets states tap the immigration-status system as part of voter roll checks, a move likely to intensify debate over election integrity measures and the treatment of eligible citizens during verification.
- 2
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.
- 3Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter ChecksโSupreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.
- 4Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship ChecksโSupreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.
- 5Sotomayor apologizes to Kavanaugh for critical remarksโJustice Sotomayor apologizes to Justice Kavanaugh for public criticism of immigration opinion
US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The episode is notable for the court, whose justices traditionally avoid openly disputing each other's reasoning in public, and comes amid heightened political attention to the judiciary's handling of immigration rulings.