US regulators

President Donald Trump says the United States will not put the brakes on artificial intelligence development, speaking after a visit by Chinese leader Xi Jinping. His stance comes despite growing calls for international safeguards on AI, and signals that Washington intends to prioritise competitiveness over coordinated global restrictions on the fast-moving technology.

Chinese state media has stated that the United States shares responsibility for managing artificial intelligence, according to Bloomberg. The remark signals Beijing's push to frame AI governance as a shared global task between the two powers, amid ongoing US-China tensions over technology export controls and AI safety standards.

Australian authorities have formally summoned the chief executives of OpenAI and Anthropic to appear before a public inquiry into artificial intelligence. The move marks a rare step of compelling US AI company leaders to testify abroad. The inquiry is examining the risks and regulation of advanced AI systems, and attention is on whether the executives will attend and what commitments they may offer.

President Donald Trump says he has approved new fuel economy standards that roll back regulations put in place under the Biden administration. The move relaxes mileage requirements for US automakers, reversing one of the previous administration's key climate and emissions policies. The announcement is drawing attention for its impact on the auto industry, fuel costs, and US efforts to cut vehicle emissions.

The New York Times examines why China remains skeptical of international appeals for AI safety regulation. The report suggests Beijing views safety-led calls from the West partly as attempts to slow its technological progress, while Chinese firms compete closely with US rivals in artificial intelligence. The analysis is drawing attention to how geopolitics shapes global AI governance debates.

The first US trial against TikTok is set to test claims that the platform fueled a teen mental health crisis. The case will examine whether the company's design and algorithms contributed to harm among young users, and its outcome could shape future litigation against social media companies and pressure on regulators over youth online safety.

The Trump administration has moved to roll back fuel economy standards for cars that were put in place under President Biden. The rollback relaxes emissions and efficiency requirements imposed on automakers, reversing a central pillar of the previous administration's climate policy. The change is likely to reignite debate over vehicle pollution rules and their impact on car prices, energy use and US climate commitments.

The White House has asked leading US AI labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic, to reserve access to their new frontier models for US government safety testing before sharing them with independent evaluators. The request signals Washington's push to place federal review ahead of third-party assessment as advanced AI systems are rolled out. Commentators are weighing what this means for the balance between government oversight and independent scrutiny of leading AI developers.

Debate is resurging over the probability that advanced artificial intelligence could pose an existential threat to humanity, with discussion centering on estimates that put the risk at around 10%. Experts remain divided: some researchers argue such scenarios are plausible enough to warrant serious regulation and safety work, while others dismiss them as speculation. The figure has become a talking point in ongoing arguments over how quickly AI should be developed.

The US government is moving to insert itself into Elon Musk's legal battle with the European Union, a fight carrying a €120 million price tag. The dispute centres on regulatory action by Brussels against Musk's businesses, and Washington's intervention escalates what was already a transatlantic clash over tech regulation. Observers are watching whether US involvement will pressure the EU to soften its enforcement stance.

President Donald Trump said he approved rolling back fuel economy standards set under the Biden administration, lowering required miles-per-gallon targets for vehicles. The decision, reported widely across US outlets, eases requirements placed on automakers. Supporters frame it as cutting regulatory costs for manufacturers, while critics warn it could increase fuel consumption and emissions, making vehicle-efficiency policy a renewed political flashpoint.

US health regulators have announced a recall of raw milk cheese linked to an ongoing E. coli outbreak, according to the FDA. Outlets including DC News Now, WTNH and NewsNation are reporting the recall, which affects consumers who may have purchased the contaminated cheese. Officials typically urge anyone with the product to discard it and seek medical care if symptoms of E. coli infection develop.

Journalist Ken Klippenstein reports that US federal authorities have been scrutinizing critics of artificial intelligence under foreign agent framing, suggesting some AI skeptics are viewed as potential instruments of foreign influence. The report is drawing attention and debate about whether legitimate policy criticism of AI is being conflated with foreign interference, and what that means for free speech and public discourse on AI regulation.

A New York Times analysis examines why China treats American-led calls for A.I. safety cooperation with suspicion, framing them as moves that could slow Chinese progress in the technology race. The piece explores how distrust between Washington and Beijing shapes each side's approach to regulating advanced artificial intelligence, and what that means for global governance efforts.

The Guardian reports that artificial intelligence has emerged as a defining issue for potential Democratic contenders ahead of the 2028 US presidential election, laying out where prospective candidates stand on the technology. Early positioning on AI regulation, jobs and safety is becoming a way for hopefuls to differentiate themselves, showing the debate is moving from policy circles into campaign strategy well before primaries begin.

Politico reports on growing friction between the Trump administration and Anthropic over the direction of US artificial intelligence policy. The president had pushed an aggressive agenda to accelerate AI development with minimal regulation, but Anthropic has emerged as a significant obstacle, pushing back on the administration's approach. The story is drawing wide attention and debate about the balance between innovation and AI safety.

The Federal Reserve has put forward proposed rules for stablecoins under the GENIUS Act, the US legislation establishing a federal framework for dollar-pegged digital tokens. The proposal would set requirements for issuers operating under US oversight. The move marks a key step in implementing the new stablecoin law and is being closely watched by banks, crypto firms, and regulators assessing how the market will be supervised.

US regulators have eased fuel economy rules, and analysts say the change could affect General Motors and Ford in different ways. With less pressure to sell electric vehicles, the two automakers' stock outlooks are no longer moving in lockstep. Investors are weighing which company benefits more from the relaxed standards.

TikTok has agreed to pay at least $100 million to settle a lawsuit with the US state of Alabama. The settlement marks another legal and financial setback for the company in the United States, where it faces ongoing scrutiny from state attorneys general and federal regulators over its operations and practices.

The European Union says it will stand firm against Elon Musk's social media platform X after the United States backed a legal challenge to EU content rules. The dispute centers on the EU's Digital Services Act enforcement against X, and Brussels insists it will defend its regulatory authority in court despite Washington's intervention.

Forbes argues that the greatest threat to American leadership is not artificial intelligence itself but a slowdown in its development. The piece contends that slowing AI progress, whether through regulation or hesitancy, risks ceding technological ground to competitors such as China. The argument is feeding into the ongoing debate in Washington and industry over how fast AI should be allowed to advance.

Donald Trump is planning to reverse fuel economy standards introduced under the Biden administration. The rollback would undo stricter efficiency requirements for cars and light trucks, easing pressure on automakers while likely drawing criticism from environmental groups. It fits a broader agenda of dismantling his predecessor's climate and energy regulations, and it is expected to face legal and political pushback.

A reporter has tested the player-protection measures that DraftKings, one of the largest US sports betting operators, says it has in place to guard against problem gambling. The findings are prompting discussion about how effective self-exclusion tools, deposit limits and identity checks really are, and whether regulators should tighten requirements on the fast-growing online betting industry.

The crypto industry is increasingly working directly with US regulators rather than waiting for Congress to pass comprehensive crypto legislation. The shift reflects frustration with stalled market-structure bills and a pragmatic turn toward engaging agencies such as the SEC on rulemaking and compliance. Commentators see it as a sign that policy is now being shaped in regulatory channels rather than on Capitol Hill.

Prediction market operator Kalshi has lost a ruling at the appeals court level concerning whether state regulators can oversee its prediction markets. The decision means states may retain authority to regulate or restrict certain event contracts, a setback for Kalshi's argument that federal law preempts state oversight of its business. The ruling is likely to shape ongoing disputes between prediction market platforms and state gaming and securities regulators.

Tensions are rising in US healthcare over the use of artificial intelligence, with insurance payers and care providers clashing over how AI is deployed. Insurers increasingly use algorithms for claims review and prior authorization, while providers argue the tools delay or deny care and add administrative burdens. Health system leaders are calling for oversight and regulation as both sides race to adopt AI.