search
US state election officials
Trends
- 1Supreme Court lets states use SAVE database for citizenship checks●Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows state officials to cross-check voter registration records against the immigration database, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Critics argue such checks risk wrongly purging eligible voters, particularly naturalised citizens, while supporters frame the ruling as a victory for election integrity.
- 2Justice Department Charges 12 People Over Election Crimes▼Justice Department Announces Charges and Guilty Pleas Involving 12 Individuals for Election Crimes
The US Department of Justice has announced charges and guilty pleas involving 12 individuals for election-related crimes. The announcement was made via the department's official website, though details of the specific offenses, the defendants' identities and the sentences involved have not yet been widely circulated. The case comes amid ongoing national scrutiny of election integrity and enforcement of voting laws.
- 3VotingWorks Wins First Federal Certification for Open-Source Voting System▼VotingWorks Makes History as First Open-Source Voting System to Earn Federal Certification
VotingWorks has become the first organization to receive federal certification for an open-source voting system in the United States. The milestone means election officials can now adopt publicly auditable voting software that meets US Election Assistance Commission standards. Supporters of election transparency are highlighting the decision as a step toward greater trust and verifiability in American election infrastructure.
- 4Judge Blocks US From Tying Emergency Grants to Election Changes▼Judge Blocks U.S. From Tying Emergency Grants to Election Changes
A federal judge has blocked the US government from making emergency grants conditional on states or localities changing their election procedures. The ruling stops federal officials from using pandemic-related or emergency funding as leverage to impose voting rule changes. The decision is being reported by major outlets including the New York Times and touches on ongoing debates over federal power and election administration.
- 5Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks Before Midterms●Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks via SAVE Database Before Midterms
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.
- 6Maricopa County official explains efforts to restore election trust▼Maricopa County official on how they're tackling mistrust around election security
A Maricopa County election official spoke with NPR about the county's efforts to address public mistrust in election security. The discussion centered on steps Arizona's most populous county is taking to reassure voters about the integrity of its election processes, an issue that has drawn sustained scrutiny in the state since 2020.
- 7
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.
- 8US Postal Service warns it may stop delivering mail ballots▼Postal Service says it will not deliver ballots if states refuse to turn over voter lists under Trump proposal
The US Postal Service says it will not deliver mail ballots in states that refuse to hand over voter lists, a requirement tied to a proposal pushed by President Trump. The stand-off puts election officials and the agency on a collision course ahead of upcoming votes, raising concerns about ballot access and administration in affected states.
- 9Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks●Supreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.
- 10Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter Checks●Supreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.
- 11Mail-in voting remains an option in this year's midterms▼Mail-in voting is still an option for this year’s midterms. Here’s what voters should know.
News outlets are reminding voters that mail-in ballots remain available for this year's US midterm elections, alongside practical guidance on deadlines, eligibility and application procedures. The coverage comes as rules differ from state to state, and officials urge voters to check requirements early so their ballots arrive and are counted on time.
- 12White House Seeks Bigger Role in Running US Elections▼Where the White House Stands in Its Push for a Bigger Role in Running Elections
The White House is pushing for a larger federal role in the administration of US elections, a system traditionally run by the states. The Wall Street Journal examines where that effort currently stands. The move is likely to draw fierce debate over federalism, with Democrats and election officials warning against centralized control of voting procedures ahead of upcoming contests.
- 13
US election rules in place for this year's contests may not carry over to the 2028 cycle, according to a Crain's Cleveland report. Voting procedures, ballot access requirements and campaign regulations are frequently revised between presidential cycles by state legislatures, courts and election officials, meaning both voters and candidates could face a different rulebook next time.
- 14Calls for US politicians to stay out of Israel's elections▼American politicians should stay out of Israel’s elections
The Jerusalem Post argues that American politicians should not involve themselves in Israel's elections, reigniting debate over foreign interference in the country's political campaigns. The column reflects broader friction between Israel and the United States over political meddling, as Israeli election seasons regularly draw commentary from US officials and lawmakers.
- 15CSIS examines terrorism threat to 2026 midterm elections▼The Terrorism Threat to the 2026 Midterm Elections: What the Data Tells Us
The Center for Strategic and International Studies has published an analysis of the terrorism threat facing the 2026 United States midterm elections, drawing on data to assess risks around the voting cycle. The report examines patterns in extremist activity and what they suggest about potential threats to candidates, officials and the electoral process.
- 16Supreme Court DHS voter database ruling won't affect California 2026 election▼Supreme Court ruling on DHS voter database will have no impact on California’s 2026 general election
The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning a Department of Homeland Security voter database, and officials say it will have no impact on California's 2026 general election. The decision clarifies how federal data access rules apply to states, but California's voting procedures for 2026 remain unchanged, according to local reporting in Lassen County.
- 17
Peter Navarro, a senior White House trade adviser, has issued a warning to Canada against interfering in United States elections. The statement came amid ongoing friction between Washington and Ottawa over trade and political matters. Details of what prompted the warning or how Canadian officials responded were not immediately available.
- 18US Senators Urge Rubio to Respect Brazil's Elections●Shaheen, Kaine, Welch Call on Secretary Rubio to Respect Free Elections in Brazil
Senators Jeanne Shaheen, Tim Kaine and Peter Welch have called on Secretary of State Marco Rubio to respect free elections in Brazil. The three Democratic lawmakers issued the appeal through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, pressing the Trump administration's top diplomat to back democratic processes in the South American country amid tensions between Washington and Brasília.
- 19Pentagon issues new directive to protect US voting systems●❓ How will the Pentagon's new security directive protect voting systems in the 2026 US midterms? 🏛️🛡️ US Defense Departm
The US Defense Department has issued a new security directive aimed at protecting American voting systems ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The Pentagon is working with state election officials to shield critical election infrastructure from foreign cyber threats. The initiative is being discussed as part of broader national defense reporting on election security.