search
VPN
Trends
- 1Court rules Utah VPN law demands a technical impossibility●Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility
A court has sided with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in its challenge to Utah's VPN-related law, agreeing with the group's argument that the statute requires something technically impossible to implement. The EFF has long contended that the law's requirements for handling VPN services cannot be met with existing technology, and the ruling validates that position. The decision is likely to shape ongoing legal battles over state internet regulation and age-verification rules.
- 2How to watch the 2026 Bahrain Grand Prix from Malaysia▼How to watch Bahrain Grand Prix in Malaysia 2026: Live stream F1 race from anywhere
The 2026 Formula 1 season opener, the Bahrain Grand Prix, is approaching, and fans in Malaysia are looking for ways to follow the race live. Guides are circulating explaining which local broadcasters and streaming services carry F1 coverage in Malaysia, and how viewers travelling abroad can use a VPN to access their usual streaming service and watch the race from anywhere.
- 3F-Droid warns OpenVPN for Android update wipes profiles●PSA: While our update cycles get faster, updates come sooner, sometimes too soon 😼 # OpenVPN for # Android 0.7.66 has a
F-Droid is warning users that OpenVPN for Android version 0.7.66 contains a bug that wipes saved VPN profiles. The team is advising users to open the Updates section of the F-Droid client, tap OpenVPN details and select 'ignore this update' until a fix arrives. The PSA highlights the trade-off of faster release cycles, where updates can ship before they are fully stable.
- 4New Congress Site-Blocking Bill Would Target VPNs▼Congress Has Another Site-Blocking Bill, And This One Targets VPNs
A new bill in Congress would require internet providers to block access to certain websites, and would also go after VPN services used to circumvent those blocks. Digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation raised the alarm, arguing the measure risks broad censorship tools and undermines user privacy. The proposal has drawn criticism from online rights advocates as debate over site-blocking legislation returns to Washington.