Washington Technology

US Senator Rick Scott has stated that Congress is unable to regulate artificial intelligence, a remark that is drawing attention amid ongoing debate in Washington over whether lawmakers should set rules for AI development. Critics argue the claim sidesteps Congress's legislative responsibilities, while supporters say the technology is moving too fast for legislation to keep up.

A new report describes a thriving black market for advanced GPUs that persists despite US export controls aimed at keeping cutting-edge chips out of restricted countries. Smugglers and intermediaries reportedly keep finding ways to move hardware around sanctions, undermining Washington's technology restrictions. The piece is drawing attention among technology and policy readers debating whether export controls can ever truly work.

A Wall Street Journal opinion piece argues that Donald Trump's approach to artificial intelligence is sound, framing his stance against a deal involving Senate Democrats over data centers. The column weighs in on the ongoing political fight in Washington over AI policy, energy-hungry data center buildouts, and the partisan divide over how the technology should be regulated and promoted.

The Netherlands is following China, France, and Russia in taking steps to break US dominance in technology, according to comments circulating this week. The claim says the Dutch government acted after the United States remotely disabled computers used by judges in The Hague who had criticized Washington. The story is drawing attention because it suggests American control of critical tech infrastructure extends even to close Western allies.

US prosecutors have charged a man with illegally shipping Nvidia chips to China, in violation of export controls restricting sales of advanced semiconductors. The case highlights ongoing US efforts to prevent cutting-edge American chip technology from reaching Chinese buyers, a central front in the wider technology standoff between Washington and Beijing.

A group of US lawmakers is arguing that Congress should step in to regulate artificial intelligence. The debate centres on whether federal legislation is needed to set rules for how AI systems are developed and used, an issue that has divided officials in Washington and is being weighed as the technology spreads rapidly across industries.

The University of Washington is relocating its Global Innovation Exchange program to Microsoft's Redmond campus under a rent-free arrangement, GeekWire reports. The move places the academic program, which focuses on technology and innovation, directly alongside one of the world's largest tech companies, deepening ties between the university and the industry partner.

Huawei is accelerating the rollout of its Tau chip across the new Mate 90 smartphone series, another step in its push to overcome US export restrictions through home-grown semiconductor technology. The company says the foldable Mate XT 2 is on track to reach 1 million sales. The developments underline China's continued progress in domestic chip capability despite Washington's curbs.

Lawmakers are arguing that artificial intelligence companies should bear legal responsibility for the actions of their models. The position signals growing pressure in Washington to impose liability rules on AI developers, rather than leaving harms from AI systems unaddressed. The debate touches on how responsibility should be shared between model makers and users of the technology.

The US Navy has selected seven companies for an $828 million recompete covering business support services. The award, reported by Washington Technology, continues an existing program with a new roster of contractors. The selection matters for government services firms competing for steady federal work, and industry watchers are tracking which companies secured spots on the multiple-award contract.

The US Senate has postponed action on a bill that would permanently ban Chinese cars from the American market, pushing consideration until after the midterm elections. The delay means the legislation will remain in limbo while voters go to the polls. The proposal has drawn attention amid ongoing concerns in Washington over Chinese technology and competition with domestic automakers, with lawmakers divided on timing and scope.

Experts are calling on federal lawmakers in Washington to introduce binding regulation of artificial intelligence, warning that risks from the fast-moving technology are outpacing government action. Their appeal raises the question of whether Congress will act, amid ongoing debate in the United States over how to oversee AI development without stifling innovation.

A leading Democrat in Congress has asked major artificial intelligence companies to provide information on whether Chinese entities have gained access to sensitive source code. The request reflects growing concern in Washington that US-developed AI technology and underlying software could be exposed to foreign adversaries. The inquiry adds to a broader push for stricter oversight of the AI industry's security practices and its dealings with China.

US export controls on advanced semiconductors are prompting questions about whether Southeast Asian nations will tilt economically toward China. Countries in the region, including Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam, sit at the centre of global chip supply chains and now face pressure to choose sides as Washington tightens controls on chip technology and equipment sold to China. Analysts warn that overreach could push regional economies into Beijing's orbit.

Congress is set to leave Washington ahead of the November midterm elections without passing any major legislation regulating artificial intelligence, according to The New York Times. Despite numerous hearings, proposals and bipartisan interest in issues like deepfakes, data privacy and AI safety, lawmakers have failed to advance comprehensive rules, leaving the United States without a federal framework as the technology rapidly develops.

CNN Politics reports that Steve Hilton questioned Xavier Becerra about artificial intelligence regulation and legislation. The exchange centres on how the US government should approach overseeing AI technology, a topic generating growing debate in Washington. Further details of the interview, including Becerra's responses and any specific policy positions discussed, were not available in the collected material.

A lawyer interviewed by CBS News says US states do have the authority to regulate artificial intelligence technology, pushing back on arguments that AI oversight should be left to the federal government. The claim lands amid growing state-level attempts to set rules on AI use and a wider debate in Washington over whether federal law should pre-empt state regulation of the fast-moving industry.

A Quinnipiac University poll has found that 71% of voters want stricter guardrails on artificial intelligence. The result points to broad public concern about AI's risks, spanning political lines, and adds pressure on lawmakers weighing new regulation of the fast-moving technology. The poll is drawing attention as AI policy debates heat up in Washington and beyond.

President Trump and a group of chief executives are trying to move artificial intelligence past its reputation as toxic or harmful, Axios reports. The effort reflects growing concern in Washington and corporate America that negative public perceptions of AI could slow investment, adoption and the technology's promised economic benefits.

President Trump and leading technology companies have reached a voluntary agreement on artificial intelligence safety. The accord, which carries no binding legal requirements, commits the participating giants to safety commitments around the development and deployment of AI systems. The deal lands amid ongoing debate in Washington over how far the government should go in regulating the fast-moving AI industry, and reactions are split between those welcoming cooperation and critics calling the voluntary approach toothless.

Commentary is arguing that American-made technologies should not be used by the United Arab Emirates in the war in Sudan. The claim raises questions about whether US-origin weapons or equipment are reaching forces involved in the conflict, and puts pressure on Washington to examine how its technology ends up in that war. Debate continues over the UAE's role in Sudan's fighting.

Consumer advocacy groups are pressing Congress to open investigations into scams proliferating on major technology platforms. They are calling on lawmakers to examine how fraud reaches users through social media and online marketplaces, and what responsibility platforms bear. The push adds to mounting scrutiny in Washington of the tech industry's consumer protection practices.