artificial intelligence chatbots

New research suggests that young adults who turn to artificial intelligence chatbots for health answers may be showing signs of anxiety or depression. The finding raises concerns that heavy reliance on AI tools for medical questions could reflect underlying mental health struggles rather than simple convenience, prompting calls for clinicians and developers to pay closer attention to why young people consult chatbots about their health.

A health expert is warning that artificial intelligence chatbots cannot replace doctors, as more people turn to tools like ChatGPT for medical advice. The caution comes amid growing use of AI for health questions, with experts stressing that chatbots can mislead, miss serious conditions and should complement rather than substitute professional medical care.

This trending item is a news headline from Al Jazeera asking whether artificial intelligence companies could be held legally responsible for mass shootings. The evidence consists only of the headline itself, so the specific arguments made in the piece are not visible. It appears to relate to broader debates about liability for AI systems, particularly if chatbots or AI tools are alleged to have influenced someone who carried out an attack, but the posts do not confirm the reason for discussion.

Anthropic will not appear at an inquiry into AI and datacentres, amid fallout from a reported hack of OpenAI. The company behind the Claude chatbot had been invited to appear, and its chief executive is expected to decline. Anthropic is instead expected to attend a separate Australian government hearing on artificial intelligence next week.

Anthropic, the San Francisco-based AI safety company behind the Claude chatbot, is reportedly running a biology lab, raising questions about why an artificial intelligence firm has wet-lab operations. Coverage is asking what the lab is for, with likely explanations tied to evaluating AI models' capabilities in biology and biosecurity research. Details on the facility's work and scope remain limited.

A Wall Street Journal opinion piece asks whether health narratives generated by artificial intelligence can be trusted, examining the risks of AI systems producing plausible-sounding but inaccurate medical information. The article fuels ongoing debate about the reliability of AI chatbots when people turn to them for health guidance and the potential consequences of confident but wrong medical answers.

Texas has built an AI chatbot designed to help people navigate the state's regulations, according to Forbes. The tool is intended to make it easier for businesses and residents to find and understand the rules that apply to them. The move puts Texas among a growing number of governments experimenting with artificial intelligence to improve access to public information and streamline bureaucratic queries.

Education experts are cautioning that students may be leaning too heavily on artificial intelligence tools, raising concerns about weakened critical thinking, reduced writing skills, and academic integrity. The warning, reported by Gulf Times, adds to a growing debate among teachers and researchers worldwide about how AI should be used in classrooms and how schools can balance its benefits with the risks to genuine learning.

Billionaire investor Mark Cuban asked Elon Musk's chatbot Grok which risks are most likely to cause human extinction within 25 years. According to reports, the AI responded that artificial intelligence is roughly 3,000 times more likely than climate change to be the cause. The claim has drawn attention because both figures are speculative model outputs rather than established scientific estimates, and climate scientists generally rank climate change among the most serious long-term global threats.

A guest commentary argues that artificial intelligence can genuinely benefit students, but only when treated as a learning tool rather than a companion. The piece warns against students forming emotional attachments to AI chatbots, arguing the technology should support study and problem-solving without replacing human relationships, teachers or peer interaction in schools.

Finance experts in South Carolina's Upstate region are cautioning people about the risks of relying on artificial intelligence tools for financial decisions. The warning highlights potential pitfalls such as inaccurate advice, data privacy concerns, and overconfidence in automated recommendations when managing personal finances.