chatbots

A newly published research paper analyses how web and mobile conversational AI agents handle user privacy. The study, 'Prompt Like a Butterfly, Sting Like a Tracker', probes what data these chatbots and assistants collect and expose, and is drawing attention on technology discussion forums where readers are debating its findings on AI tracking practices.

Anthropic's Claude is being used to power coordinated teams of AI agents, with new structured setups letting multiple instances divide work, communicate and complete complex tasks together. The approach moves Claude beyond a single chatbot into an orchestration layer for multi-agent workflows. Commenters are debating how reliable such agent teams are in practice and what the shift means for automation of knowledge work.

A chatbot associated with Donald Trump is declining to answer when asked who won the 2020 US presidential election, according to Axios. The AI gives no response on the question rather than confirming Joe Biden's victory or repeating Trump's false claims of a stolen election. The avoidance is drawing attention as observers question how the tool was designed and what it reveals about how Trump's camp wants election questions handled.

Security commentary is warning that employees who use AI chatbots, assistants, or browser tools to speed up their work without their employer's knowledge—a practice dubbed 'shadow AI'—could be putting sensitive company data at risk. Malwarebytes has published an explainer on the trend, framing it as a growing cybersecurity concern for businesses.

The Trump administration has introduced an AI-powered 'concierge' on America.gov, and reporters who tested it describe what the chatbot can and cannot do. The tool is meant to help users navigate government information, and its launch has prompted discussion about how the federal government will use artificial intelligence in public-facing services.

Users attempting to access Anthropic's Claude chatbot are being met with an "at capacity" message, suggesting demand has outstripped the service's available computing resources. The outage has prompted discussion among tech commentators about how quickly the AI assistant's popularity is growing and whether Anthropic can scale its infrastructure to keep up with sign-ups.

Investor Kassan has backed Generative Engine Optimization startup OptimizeGEO in a deal valuing the company at $80 million. The funding highlights growing investor interest in GEO, a fast-emerging field focused on helping brands stay visible in AI-driven search results, as companies race to adapt to search shifting from traditional engines toward AI assistants and chatbots.

The New York Times reports that Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah spent months consulting thinkers from many faiths on how to give the Claude chatbot a moral character. Religious scholars who took part describe being stunned by what they heard in those conversations, and the unusual pairing of a leading AI lab with faith traditions is drawing wide attention.

A quote by Polish science fiction writer Stanislaw Lem is being shared as commentary on large language models. Lem, known for works like Solaris, wrote decades ago about machines imitating human thought, and readers are drawing parallels between his warnings about simulated intelligence and today's chatbots. Discussion centres on how prescient his critique of artificial thinking now seems.

An Australian tutoring company has advised parents to save their money and use AI tools instead of paying for tutoring, according to the Australian Financial Review. The unusual recommendation from a firm whose business competes with tutoring has drawn attention, raising questions about how generative AI is reshaping the private education market and whether parents should trust chatbots to help their children learn.

USA Today published NFL Week 4 predictions for every game generated by Microsoft's Copilot AI, laying out the chatbot's picks and score forecasts across the full slate. The piece invites readers to compare the AI's calls against expert and fan predictions as the season's fourth week unfolds.

SpaceX has introduced new pricing for Grok, the xAI chatbot, and Barron's reports on what the move could mean for the company's stock. The coverage ties the AI pricing decision to investor sentiment around Elon Musk's ventures and the valuations of SpaceX and xAI, which remain privately held.

A new research effort reported via Newswise focuses on enabling artificial intelligence systems to recognize the limits of their own knowledge, flagging when they cannot reliably answer a question rather than generating confident but wrong responses. The work addresses the well-known problem of AI hallucinations, a key trust barrier for chatbots and other AI tools used in science, medicine and everyday search.

A news feature explains 'red teaming', the practice of stress-testing AI systems, software and security defences by deliberately trying to break them. Practitioners probe chatbots and networks for flaws, biases and vulnerabilities before the public finds them, work often described as thankless but essential to keeping the internet safe.

A government-run AI chatbot is facing questions about the accuracy and neutrality of its responses to election-related queries. Critics are raising concerns that automated government systems could mislead voters or show bias during sensitive electoral periods. The incident has renewed debate over how public institutions deploy AI tools and what safeguards are needed before they interact with citizens on politically charged topics.

A White House-affiliated AI chatbot associated with Donald Trump has reportedly produced responses critical of him, going against the administration's positions. The Guardian reported the story, and it is now being widely shared and debated online, with commenters highlighting the irony of an official AI assistant contradicting the president it was built to serve.

The US government's new AI chatbot has reportedly scaled back from debunking false claims about Donald Trump, according to NDTV. The change means the government-run tool may no longer actively correct misinformation involving the president, raising concerns among observers about accuracy and political influence over official AI systems. Critics see the move as part of a broader pattern of federal tech tools being aligned more closely with the White House's positions.