courts

Newly unsealed court briefs in the Authors Guild's copyright lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI indicate that top executives at the companies knew that using pirated books to train AI models was legally questionable. The Authors Guild has published the filings, which lawyers and authors are scrutinising for what they reveal about internal awareness and intent in the dispute over AI training data.

Justice Edson Fachin is among the most searched topics in Brazil. Recent political coverage has kept the judiciary in the spotlight, including a dispute in which President Lula was accused of spreading a false story and was publicly challenged over it. Readers are following developments involving the Supreme Court and the country's charged political climate.

New U.S. sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court are being described as a threat to European sovereignty. The measures could affect European officials and entities cooperating with the Hague-based court, raising concerns in EU capitals about Washington pressuring an institution many European states consider central to international law.

The Bombay High Court has set aside a family court order granting a father and mother equal, 50:50 custody of their child, holding that the concept of 'joint parenting' does not exist in Indian law. The ruling clarifies that custody decisions must rest on the child's welfare under existing legal frameworks rather than an automatic equal split, a position likely to shape how Indian family courts approach shared custody demands.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, according to a CNBC report. The ruling maintains a decision tied to Pentagon-related concerns over the company's role in federal supply chains. The designation is significant for the AI sector, as it could affect Anthropic's ability to win government contracts and signals heightened scrutiny of major AI providers in national security contexts.

The European Union has adopted sanctions in response to the deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia. The measures target those deemed responsible for the forced transfers, which have been widely condemned internationally, including by the International Criminal Court, which has issued arrest warrants over the practice. The move adds to the EU's ongoing sanctions regime against Moscow over its war in Ukraine.

Oil industry interests are asking the US Supreme Court to take up a case, a move being described as an audacious attempt to shield fossil fuel companies from climate-related lawsuits. The request comes as cities and states pursue litigation seeking damages for climate harms, and the industry is seeking a ruling that could curtail those claims. Climate advocates warn the outcome could shape the future of climate accountability cases.

The Dutch government is preparing for possible US sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court, which is headquartered in The Hague. The sanctions could disrupt the court's operations, including its banking and staff arrangements. The move follows the ICC's warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and European governments are weighing how to shield the court from American pressure.

Several men have been accused of planning a terrorist attack near a British air base that was used in strikes against Iran. The alleged plot targeted a site tied to recent military operations, drawing attention to security around UK defence facilities. Details about the suspects, charges and court proceedings have not been confirmed in the available reporting.

A new examination of legal responsibility asks who should answer when autonomous AI agents cause harm. As companies deploy AI systems that act independently on users' behalf, existing liability frameworks struggle to assign blame between developers, deployers, and users. The piece weighs whether current negligence and product liability law can cover mistakes made by software that decides and acts on its own, a question courts and regulators are only beginning to confront.

A US judge has overturned President Trump's ban blocking certain media outlets from White House access, ruling the exclusion unlawful. The decision is a significant rebuke to the administration's handling of press access and is being widely covered, with debate focusing on press freedom and the limits of presidential control over which journalists may cover the president.

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain reporters from White House press access. CNN reported the decision, which means the affected journalists must be allowed back into official briefings and events. Supporters of the ruling see it as a win for press freedom and the First Amendment, while critics of judicial intervention are pushing back. The case is one of several legal battles over the administration's treatment of the media.

An Israeli court has found that the government is in violation of its ruling requiring Red Cross access to Palestinian prisoners. The decision highlights an ongoing standoff between Israel's judiciary and the government over detention conditions and prisoners' rights. The ruling comes amid heightened tensions over Palestinian detainees held since the Gaza war, with rights groups pressing for independent monitoring of their treatment.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.

India's Supreme Court has rebuked the government over delays in setting a timeline for mandatory warning labels on packaged food products. The criticism puts pressure on authorities to move forward with front-of-pack labelling rules, a measure health advocates have long pushed for to combat rising rates of obesity, diabetes and other diet-related diseases in the country.

A German court has ruled that Meta is liable for fraudulent advertisements that ran on Facebook and Instagram, per a report from The Next Web. The decision means the company can be held responsible when users are deceived by scam ads on its platforms, rather than being treated as a neutral host. It is being read as a significant precedent for platform accountability in Europe.

A federal judge has temporarily paused the Trump administration's ban barring CNN from the White House, and the network's reporters were allowed back into the building. The case has become a flashpoint in the broader fight over press access and the administration's efforts to penalize news outlets it views as unfavorable.

Across the United States, people have been showing up in immigration courtrooms to accompany immigrants and deter ICE from detaining people at hearings. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun, whose presence supporters say can influence outcomes, since faith leaders standing beside defendants has been shown to affect how cases proceed. The practice has spread as a form of peaceful accompaniment.

Financial technology firm Finastra has reached a $3.13 million settlement in a class action lawsuit stemming from a data breach. The agreement resolves claims brought by affected customers over the company's handling of sensitive personal and financial information. The deal awaits court approval, and details on compensation payouts have not yet been disclosed.

A Supreme Court ruling is raising concerns that it could weaken Black voting power across the Southern United States. The decision is being read as potentially diminishing the electoral influence of Black communities, and civil rights advocates are expected to scrutinize its consequences for redistricting and voting rights protections in Southern states.

Israel's Supreme Court has ruled that the government is violating its earlier order requiring access for visits to Palestinian prisoners. The decision finds the state non-compliant with a prior court ruling, sharpening tensions between the judiciary and the government over treatment of detainees.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first campaign since the Supreme Court overturned federal abortion rights, a decision her 2018 confirmation vote for Justice Brett Kavanaugh helped make possible. Abortion has become a central issue in her reelection race, with opponents arguing her vote enabled the rollback of Roe v. Wade, while Collins defends her record in a state that has backed abortion rights protections.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

During a hearing on the Election Commission, the Supreme Court discussed whether the body must not only be independent but also be seen as independent. Lawyers and observers weighed how public perception of impartiality matters as much as actual autonomy. The remarks have drawn wide attention, with commentators saying the observations reflect growing concern over the credibility of India's election machinery ahead of future polls.

As the US Supreme Court begins its new term, attention is turning to a set of election-related cases it could agree to hear. The pending disputes touch on voting rules and election administration, and observers on both sides are watching closely, since the justices' choices could shape how future American elections are run.

A Belgian court ruling has created uncertainty around compliance with the EU's minimum tax directive, according to Bloomberg Tax reporting. The decision raises questions for multinational companies about how to apply the 15% global minimum tax rules across the bloc, as legal challenges to the Pillar Two framework continue to work through national courts. Businesses and tax advisers are now awaiting clarity on whether the ruling undermines obligations under the directive.

A recent court ruling has solidified a retreat from enforcement of the disability integration mandate, the policy requiring services to be provided in community settings rather than institutions. The decision creates uncertainty for senior living operators, who now face unclear expectations around compliance. Industry observers say providers are left weighing how the ruling affects obligations to residents and future regulatory direction.