election judges

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to make states adopt election-related changes as a condition for receiving anti-terrorism grant funding. The decision stops the administration from withholding homeland security money to pressure states over election policy. It is the latest judicial setback to White House efforts to link federal funding to its political priorities.

A federal judge ruled that the federal government cannot withhold counterterrorism funding from states in order to pressure them into changing how they run elections. The decision limits the use of homeland security grants as leverage over state election administration, reinforcing that states control their own election systems and that such funds cannot be conditioned on unrelated policy demands.

A federal judge has ruled that the Federal Emergency Management Agency cannot condition security grant funding on states making changes to their election systems. The decision limits FEMA's ability to use homeland security grants as leverage over election policy, a move that had raised concerns about federal overreach into state-administered elections.

A judge has tasked the government with creating a non-medical safe-supply drug program. The ruling follows the convictions of Kalicum and Nyx, who admitted last year to trafficking after buying pure drugs, and is being described as potentially significant for election campaigns. The decision has drawn limited media coverage so far.

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration cannot withhold FEMA antiterrorism preparedness grants from states over election-related policy changes. The decision means states will keep access to federal security funding regardless of their election rules, in a case with implications for how far the administration can use grant conditions to pressure states on voting policy.

The Supreme Court will consider whether judges have the power to extend polling hours, but the case will not be heard until after the November election. The timing means any ruling on the issue will come too late to affect voting procedures in the upcoming contest, though it could shape how courts respond to polling-place disruptions in future elections.

Champaign County, Illinois officials warn that polling locations may have to close unless more residents sign up to serve as election judges. Without enough judges to staff precincts, some voters could face longer trips or consolidated sites in upcoming elections. Officials are urging residents to volunteer to keep voting accessible across the county.

A federal judge has blocked FEMA from conditioning counterterrorism grant funds for states on adopting election reforms. The ruling means states can keep receiving emergency security money without facing pressure over voting rules. The decision lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over whether federal agencies can tie funding to state election administration changes.

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the power to extend polling hours, but will not take up the case until after the November election. The timing means the question of judicial authority over voting hours will remain unresolved during the upcoming vote, drawing attention from election watchers concerned about how disputes at the polls would be handled this year.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the authority to extend voting hours at polling places, but the case will not be heard until after the November election. The timing means any ruling will come too late to affect the upcoming vote, though the question could shape how courts handle election-day disruptions in future contests.

A federal judge has blocked rules from the Federal Emergency Management Agency that tied election-related requirements to anti-terrorism grant funding. The ruling stops the agency from attaching those conditions to security grants, a decision that affects how states and local governments receive and use federal money intended to protect elections and public safety. The full reasoning behind the order and any next steps, including possible appeals, are not yet detailed in available reporting.

Candidates vying for the open North Carolina Court of Appeals seat spoke publicly about judicial ethics and recusal standards ahead of the election. The discussion comes as state appellate races draw increasing attention over judges' impartiality and political ties. Voters and observers are weighing how the contenders would handle conflicts of interest if seated on the court.

The 2026 elections for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest criminal court, are drawing attention to which judges and candidates will compete for seats on the nine-member bench. Coverage is laying out the declared candidates, the seats up for grabs, and what the races could mean for criminal justice policy in Texas ahead of the primary and general elections.

A federal judge has stopped the Trump administration from making homeland security terrorism-prevention grants conditional on states or cities adopting election-related changes. The ruling blocks the administration from using federal security funding as leverage over local election rules, a move critics called coercive. The decision is likely to be cited in ongoing legal fights over presidential power and election administration.