election judges

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to make states adopt election-related changes as a condition for receiving anti-terrorism grant funding. The decision stops the administration from withholding homeland security money to pressure states over election policy. It is the latest judicial setback to White House efforts to link federal funding to its political priorities.

A federal judge has ruled that the Federal Emergency Management Agency cannot condition security grant funding on states making changes to their election systems. The decision limits FEMA's ability to use homeland security grants as leverage over election policy, a move that had raised concerns about federal overreach into state-administered elections.

A federal judge ruled that the federal government cannot withhold counterterrorism funding from states in order to pressure them into changing how they run elections. The decision limits the use of homeland security grants as leverage over state election administration, reinforcing that states control their own election systems and that such funds cannot be conditioned on unrelated policy demands.

A federal judge has blocked the US government from making emergency grants conditional on states or localities changing their election procedures. The ruling stops federal officials from using pandemic-related or emergency funding as leverage to impose voting rule changes. The decision is being reported by major outlets including the New York Times and touches on ongoing debates over federal power and election administration.

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot condition anti-terrorism grants on election security measures. The decision limits the administration's ability to use federal funding as leverage over state and local governments on election-related policy. The ruling is drawing attention amid ongoing debates over federal power, election administration, and the allocation of homeland security money.

A federal judge has blocked the Federal Emergency Management Agency from conditioning antiterrorism grants on changes to election practices. The ruling stops the agency from using homeland security funding as leverage over how states run their elections, a move critics said would blur the line between disaster and security funding and election administration. The decision is likely to be appealed and fuels ongoing legal fights over federal conditions on state election rules.

A federal judge has ruled that the Federal Emergency Management Agency cannot condition antiterrorism grant funding on states making changes to their election systems. The decision stops the agency from using security grants as leverage over election administration. The ruling is being closely watched amid ongoing disputes over federal authority over state-run elections.

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot withhold counterterrorism funding from states as a way to force changes to election procedures. The decision blocks an attempt to pressure states through federal homeland security grants. The ruling limits the administration's use of funding conditions to influence how states run elections.

A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration's attempt to withhold states' anti-terrorism funding unless they adopt new voting restrictions. The ruling blocks the administration from conditioning federal security grants on changes to state election rules, a move critics called coercive and unlawful. Supporters of voting rights groups have welcomed the decision, while the administration could still appeal, keeping the fight over federal leverage on election policy alive.

Cook County is recruiting election judges while Illinois prepares poll monitors ahead of the November 3 midterm election. Officials in the state are ramping up staffing and oversight measures to run polling places smoothly, and the effort is drawing attention as election administration becomes a closely watched issue nationwide.

Researchers writing in The Conversation say deepfake content is distorting this year's Victorian state election in Australia. Their analysis identifies which groups of voters are most susceptible to manipulated audio and video, warning that synthetic media could influence how people judge candidates and parties ahead of polling day.

A guide from Protect Democracy explains the process by which Congress seats the winners of federal elections. Under US law, each chamber of Congress judges the elections and qualifications of its own members, receiving certificates of election and resolving disputes or challenges before newly elected representatives and senators can take their seats. The explainer comes amid ongoing attention to election certification procedures.

A judge has tasked the government with creating a non-medical safe-supply drug program. The ruling follows the convictions of Kalicum and Nyx, who admitted last year to trafficking after buying pure drugs, and is being described as potentially significant for election campaigns. The decision has drawn limited media coverage so far.

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration cannot withhold FEMA antiterrorism preparedness grants from states over election-related policy changes. The decision means states will keep access to federal security funding regardless of their election rules, in a case with implications for how far the administration can use grant conditions to pressure states on voting policy.

New York City has appealed a Staten Island judge's ruling that struck down the pied-à-terre tax championed by mayor-elect Zohrani Mamdani, a proposal to levy higher taxes on rarely used luxury apartments. The appeal keeps the contentious property tax measure alive as opponents and supporters await a higher court's decision.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the power to extend polling hours, but the case will not be heard until after the November election. The timing means any ruling on judicial authority over voting hours will come after voters have already gone to the polls, drawing attention to how courts handle election-related disputes during a campaign.

Champaign County, Illinois officials warn that polling locations may have to close unless more residents sign up to serve as election judges. Without enough judges to staff precincts, some voters could face longer trips or consolidated sites in upcoming elections. Officials are urging residents to volunteer to keep voting accessible across the county.

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the power to extend polling hours, but will not take up the case until after the November election. The timing means the question of judicial authority over voting hours will remain unresolved during the upcoming vote, drawing attention from election watchers concerned about how disputes at the polls would be handled this year.

Local election officials are encouraging high school students to apply to serve as election judges. The push, reported by WGEM, aims to bring younger poll workers into the election process, typically offering students hands-on civic experience and sometimes pay or school credit. Similar recruitment efforts have grown as many jurisdictions face shortages of poll workers ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the authority to extend voting hours at polling places, but the case will not be heard until after the November election. The timing means any ruling will come too late to affect the upcoming vote, though the question could shape how courts handle election-day disruptions in future contests.

A federal judge has blocked FEMA from conditioning counterterrorism grant funds for states on adopting election reforms. The ruling means states can keep receiving emergency security money without facing pressure over voting rules. The decision lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over whether federal agencies can tie funding to state election administration changes.

A federal judge has blocked rules from the Federal Emergency Management Agency that tied election-related requirements to anti-terrorism grant funding. The ruling stops the agency from attaching those conditions to security grants, a decision that affects how states and local governments receive and use federal money intended to protect elections and public safety. The full reasoning behind the order and any next steps, including possible appeals, are not yet detailed in available reporting.

The 2026 elections for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest criminal court, are drawing attention to which judges and candidates will compete for seats on the nine-member bench. Coverage is laying out the declared candidates, the seats up for grabs, and what the races could mean for criminal justice policy in Texas ahead of the primary and general elections.

Candidates vying for the open North Carolina Court of Appeals seat spoke publicly about judicial ethics and recusal standards ahead of the election. The discussion comes as state appellate races draw increasing attention over judges' impartiality and political ties. Voters and observers are weighing how the contenders would handle conflicts of interest if seated on the court.

A federal judge has stopped the Trump administration from making homeland security terrorism-prevention grants conditional on states or cities adopting election-related changes. The ruling blocks the administration from using federal security funding as leverage over local election rules, a move critics called coercive. The decision is likely to be cited in ongoing legal fights over presidential power and election administration.