MikeTrendsTrends right now

search

SHA-1

Trends

  1. 1
    Git 3.0's SHA-256 switch called a costly mistake●Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistakeYhn5349 h ago

    GitButler has published an argument that Git 3.0's planned switch to SHA-256 as its default hash algorithm will prove a costly mistake, drawing lively debate among developers about compatibility, migration costs and the future of the version control system's object hashing.

  2. 2
    Git 3.0 to switch to SHA-256 hashing●Two weeks ago I helped a teammate migrate a legacy service from Bitbucket Server to GitHub. The... # git # programming #MmastodonTechnologySoftware413 min ago

    Git 3.0 will move from the aging SHA-1 hashing algorithm to SHA-256, a change with implications for repositories, tooling and workflows across the software industry. The news is being discussed alongside developers sharing experiences migrating legacy code services, such as moving from Bitbucket Server to GitHub, and at least one Git co-creator has weighed in on the decision. Developers are debating how disruptive the transition will be for existing repositories.

  3. 3
    Git 3.0's SHA-256 default called a costly mistake●Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake | Butler's Log https:// blog.gitbutler.com/git-3-sha-2 56 #MmastodonTechnologySoftware51 d ago

    A new blog post from GitButler argues that Git 3.0's plan to make SHA-256 the default hash algorithm will be a costly mistake for the version control system. The piece critiques the upcoming switch away from SHA-1, and the argument is being circulated among developers discussing Git's roadmap and the practical impact of the hash transition.

  4. 4
    Git co-founder criticizes SHA-256 switch in Git 3.0●Scott Chacon says Git 3.0's SHA-256 default fixes a problem no repository has hit and breaks 40-character hashes everywhMmastodonTechnologySoftware38 h ago

    Scott Chacon, Git's co-founder, has criticized plans to make SHA-256 the default hash in the upcoming Git 3.0 release. He argues the change fixes a collision problem that no real repository has ever encountered, while breaking existing 40-character SHA-1 commit identifiers across tooling and workflows. The Git project has responded that no release date has been set for the transition, leaving the debate open within the developer community.

  5. 5
    Git co-creator criticises Git 3.0's SHA-256 switch●Github co-creator & Pro Git author skewers Git 3.0's SHA-256 move https:// leminal.space/post/40429688MmastodonTechnologySoftware113 h ago

    Scott Chacon, co-founder of GitHub and author of the Pro Git book, has publicly criticised the plan to move Git 3.0 to SHA-256 hashes. His remarks have drawn attention among developers, with discussion focusing on the migration risks for existing repositories and tooling as the version control system prepares to leave behind SHA-1.