State supreme courts

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters, a decision with direct implications for election administration. Supporters say the tool helps states maintain accurate voter rolls, while critics warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged ahead of elections.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard. The New York Times reported the surprise withdrawal, which removes one justice from proceedings that could shape how climate litigation proceeds in the United States. No reason for the recusal was given in the initial reporting, and legal observers are watching closely for what it means for the case's outcome.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change case before the court. The announcement, reported by SCOTUSblog, removes one justice from a dispute with potential consequences for climate regulation, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. Reasons for the withdrawal were not stated in the report.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate case, reversing an earlier decision to take part. The move comes amid scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest surrounding the justice. The reversal is drawing attention to ethical questions facing the Supreme Court and to the stakes of the climate litigation, which could have significant consequences for environmental regulation in the United States.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

A Supreme Court ruling concerning a disputed election may conflict with existing state law, according to reporting by Honolulu Civil Beat. The ruling raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial decisions and state statutes point in different directions. Further details about which state, which election, and the specific legal provisions involved were not provided in the available information.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case before the court. The decision removes one justice from a ruling that could shape how climate-related claims are handled in the United States, and observers are watching closely for what his absence means for the outcome.

The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine the fate of climate lawsuits brought by states and municipalities against major oil companies. Without giving a reason, Alito's removal leaves eight justices to weigh whether the suits, which seek damages for climate change harms, can proceed. The outcome could reshape how oil companies are held accountable for emissions, making the case one of the most consequential climate-related matters to reach the high court.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.

The US Supreme Court has for the third time declined to let Missouri put in place a new congressional map expected to help Republicans win more House seats. The order leaves the map on hold while litigation continues, and it marks repeated refusals by the justices to intervene on the state's behalf, keeping the redrawn districts out of use for now.

The South Carolina Supreme Court has overturned Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions in the killings of his wife Maggie and son Paul. The disgraced former lawyer was sentenced to life in prison in 2023 after a trial that drew national attention. The court's ruling raises the prospect of a new trial, and the case remains one of the most closely followed legal sagas in the United States.

The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use a federal database to verify the citizenship of voter registration applicants. The decision, reported by Route Fifty, clears the way for expanded vetting ahead of the midterm elections, though analysts say its practical effect on the upcoming contests will be limited because implementation timelines and coverage constraints restrict how widely the tool can be applied.

The Supreme Court has rejected a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, handing Democrats a win in the ongoing battle over redistricting. The ruling could force new district lines ahead of upcoming elections and affects the balance of a state where Republicans currently dominate the congressional delegation. Observers are weighing what the decision means for Democratic prospects in Missouri and for the broader national fight over gerrymandering.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.

Israel’s Supreme Court has ruled that the government is in violation of a previous court order concerning visits to prisoners. The ruling finds the state failed to comply with arrangements it was required to allow. The decision adds to ongoing legal disputes between Israel’s judiciary and government, and is likely to draw attention from human rights groups and legal observers in the region.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.

President Trump has publicly criticized the Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The dispute centers on GOP efforts to redraw the state's districts to their advantage, with the court repeatedly refusing to allow the new boundaries to take effect. Trump blasted the justices' decision, intensifying tensions between the White House and a court he appointed a majority of, and keeping redistricting fights in the national spotlight.

Energy industry interests are asking the US Supreme Court to take up a case that could shield oil companies from climate-related lawsuits. According to Vox, the request is being described as audacious, with critics saying the industry is seeking to escape accountability in state courts where dozens of cities and states are suing over climate damages.

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Missouri's 2022 congressional district map for the third time, rejecting renewed challenges to the state's redistricting plan. The repeated decisions leave the map adopted by Missouri Republicans after the 2020 census in place. Legal fights over the boundaries have stretched on since its adoption.

The Supreme Court has issued a decision concerning a federal voter-citizenship database, with potential consequences for upcoming midterm elections. The ruling raises questions about how states verify voter eligibility and could influence election administration and turnout battles heading into the midterms, with officials and voting-rights groups closely watching the implications.

The U.S. Supreme Court has once more blocked Missouri's redrawn congressional district map, which critics describe as gerrymandered. The intervention stops the state's new boundaries from taking effect while litigation continues, marking a repeated setback for Missouri Republicans who pushed the map. Details on the court's reasoning and next steps in the case remain limited in initial reports.

The Supreme Court has for a third time blocked the use of a Republican-drawn electoral map in Missouri. The repeated interventions mark an unusual level of judicial scrutiny of the state's redistricting, keeping Missouri's congressional district lines in flux ahead of upcoming elections. The ruling lands amid an intensifying national fight over partisan map-drawing, with both parties redrawing districts to seek advantages in narrowly divided chambers.

The City of Boulder's landmark climate liability lawsuit is heading to the United States Supreme Court, raising questions about who pays for climate damage. The case, brought against major fossil fuel companies, tests whether local governments can seek damages in state courts for climate-related costs. Observers are weighing what the outcome could mean for similar suits nationwide.

The Supreme Court has refused for a third time to approve a Missouri congressional map backed by President Trump, leaving the state's district boundaries unchanged. The repeated rejections put the map's Republican sponsors back at square one and add a new chapter to the fight over redrawing congressional districts for partisan advantage ahead of future elections.

The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's redrawn congressional map for the third time, halting the gerrymandered district boundaries from taking effect while challenges continue. The repeated interventions keep Missouri's current congressional seats in place for now. The ruling is drawing attention from voting rights advocates and state officials locked in a dispute over partisan redistricting in the state.

The Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Trump administration's expansive citizenship database to be used for voter screening. Civil rights groups and privacy advocates warn the database could enable improper voter purges and raise serious privacy concerns, while supporters argue it helps states verify voter eligibility. The decision is expected to intensify the national fight over election administration and access to the ballot.

California's state Supreme Court has ruled that a county sheriff violated state election law by seizing ballots. The decision confirms that the seizure was unlawful under California election rules. The ruling is drawing attention to the limits of law enforcement authority over election materials and the safeguards protecting ballots in the state.

Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it rejected, for the third time, a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The rebuke highlights growing tension between Trump and a court shaped by his own appointees, with the dispute centering on gerrymandering claims and how far state legislatures can go in redrawing districts for partisan advantage ahead of upcoming elections.

A Supreme Court ruling is unlikely to change how voter eligibility checks are carried out in the upcoming midterm elections, according to a report by The New York Times. The decision may have limited practical impact on voter screening procedures. Discussion is focused on what the ruling does and does not mean for election administration.

The US Supreme Court has blocked for the third time a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, halting its use while litigation continues. The repeated interventions keep the state's district lines in flux heading into upcoming elections, and the ruling is drawing attention from voting-rights advocates and Republican lawmakers who spar over partisan gerrymandering and the court's role in election map disputes.

The US Supreme Court has blocked the Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional map, halting new district boundaries that were set to reshape the state's US House delegation. The decision pauses the map while legal challenges proceed, a significant setback for Republicans who pushed the redrawing to gain an extra congressional seat.

The Cato Institute argues that the Supreme Court's decision to reauthorize the SAVE student loan repayment program is being overstated by some commentators, and that its practical impact is smaller than claimed. The SAVE plan, an income-driven repayment scheme for federal student borrowers, has been a frequent target of litigation and political debate, making any court action on it headline-worthy.

The Supreme Court has reinstated a federal immigration database, a decision arriving just ahead of the November election. Attention is now turning to whether Arizona officials will deploy the database, a state long at the center of immigration enforcement battles. Observers are weighing how the ruling could affect state-level checks and enforcement practices, and what role immigration policy will play in campaign debates heading into the vote.