search
Supreme
Trends
- 1Trump wields presidential immunity broadly after Supreme Court ruling▼After sweeping SCOTUS presidential immunity ruling, Trump wields it broadly in push for power
Following the Supreme Court's sweeping ruling on presidential immunity, Donald Trump is invoking it broadly as he pushes to expand executive power. The ruling, which shielded official acts from prosecution, is being used to justify aggressive assertions of authority, drawing criticism from legal experts and Democrats who warn it could weaken checks on the presidency.
- 2Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for voter citizenship checks●Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. Supporters say the ruling helps states ensure only eligible voters are on the rolls, while critics warn it could lead to wrongful purges of eligible voters and raises questions about the accuracy of federal immigration records used in election administration.
- 3Supreme Court strikes down most of Trump's tariffs▼Supreme Court invalidates most of Trump's tariffs
The US Supreme Court has ruled against most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, invalidating the bulk of his trade measures. The decision marks a major legal setback for the president's trade policy, striking at the core of an economic agenda that has defined his administration's approach to imports.
- 4Trump pushes legislation to end birthright citizenship after SCOTUS setback▼Trump says 'too bad' SCOTUS upheld birthright citizenship, pushes legislation to end it
Donald Trump reacted to the Supreme Court upholding birthright citizenship, saying 'too bad,' and is pushing legislation to end the practice anyway. The exchange highlights the ongoing fight over the 14th Amendment guarantee of citizenship to children born on US soil, with Trump seeking a congressional route after the court declined to side with his position.
- 5Supreme Court Ruling Allegedly Upends Election●BOMBSHELL: Supreme Court UPENDS election with SHOCK RULING
Political commentators including Brian Tyler Cohen and Democracy Docket are amplifying claims that the US Supreme Court has issued a sweeping ruling with major consequences for an election. The reaction is being framed in dramatic terms as a bombshell that could upend the electoral landscape. Details of which ruling is meant, and its actual legal effect, are not specified.
- 6South Carolina Supreme Court overturns Alex Murdaugh murder convictions▼Alex Murdaugh murder convictions overturned by South Carolina Supreme Court
The South Carolina Supreme Court has overturned Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions, the disgraced former lawyer who was found guilty in 2023 of killing his wife Maggie and son Paul. The ruling throws out the verdicts in one of the most closely followed criminal cases in recent American history, though the court's reasoning and what happens next were not detailed in the report.
- 7Supreme Court issues surprise Friday night ruling●BREAKING: Supreme Court drops BOMBSHELL FRIDAY NIGHT ruling
The US Supreme Court has issued an unexpected ruling on a Friday evening, a timing often used for decisions courts prefer to draw less attention to. The ruling is being widely shared and discussed online, with large numbers of people reacting to what is being described as a significant and surprising development, though the specific subject of the decision remains unclear.
- 8Justice Alito Steps Aside from Supreme Court Climate Case▼Justice Alito Won’t Participate in Supreme Court Case on Climate Change
Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a Supreme Court case concerning climate change, according to a Wall Street Journal report. His recusal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially raising the stakes for any ties. No reason for his withdrawal from the case has been given in the report.
- 9Immigrants ask Supreme Court to block third-country deportations▼Immigrants ask Supreme Court to leave ruling in place preventing Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries
A group of immigrants is asking the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The filing asks the justices not to disturb protections that currently keep them from being removed to nations other than their home countries while the case continues.
- 10Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to restrict mail-in voting●Supreme Court rejects Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting
The US Supreme Court has turned down the Trump administration's effort to impose restrictions on mail-in voting. The decision preserves existing access to absentee ballots, a voting method used by millions of Americans. The ruling is drawing attention from both parties, with critics of the restrictions calling it a win for voter access and Republicans weighing the setback ahead of future elections.
- 11Supreme Court Revives Trump-Backed Voter Purge Plan●BREAKING: Supreme Court Revives Trump's Voter Purge Scheme
The Supreme Court has revived a voter purge scheme backed by Donald Trump, according to Democracy Docket's breaking report. The ruling allows the purge effort to move forward, and voting rights advocates are sounding alarm over its potential impact on eligible voters ahead of elections. Critics describe the decision as a major setback for ballot access, while supporters view it as restoring state authority over election rolls.
- 12Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate Case▼Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate-Change Case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate-change case just days before it was due to be heard, according to a New York Times report. The recusal of a justice at the last minute from such a consequential case is highly unusual, and it remains unclear what prompted the decision or how it will affect the court's handling of the dispute.
- 13Supreme Court takes suo motu notice of Delhi bus gang-rape●SC takes suo motu cognisance of gang-rape of minor in moving bus in Delhi-NCR.
The Supreme Court of India has taken suo motu cognisance of the gang-rape of a minor girl aboard a moving bus in the Delhi-NCR region. By acting on its own initiative without a petition, the court has signalled the severity of the case. The incident has renewed public anger over the safety of women and children on public transport in the capital region.
- 14Supreme Court debates visibility of Election Commission independence▼सिर्फ स्वतंत्र होना नहीं, दिखना भी जरूरी... Election Commission पर Supreme Court में क्या बहस हुई?
The Supreme Court of India heard arguments that the Election Commission must not only be independent but also appear independent to the public. The remarks came during proceedings concerning the appointment and accountability of Election Commissioners, with the court stressing that public perception of impartiality matters as much as actual autonomy. The hearing has drawn wide attention ahead of electoral debates in the country.
- 15Justice Alito recuses from major Supreme Court climate case▼Alito recuses from major climate change case to be decided by the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the report, but his withdrawal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially increasing the chance of a split ruling on an issue with far-reaching environmental and regulatory consequences.
- 16Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate dispute▼Justice Alito will no longer participate in climate change dispute
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change case before the court. The announcement, reported by SCOTUSblog, removes one justice from a dispute with potential consequences for climate regulation, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. Reasons for the withdrawal were not stated in the report.
- 17Israel's Supreme Court to rule on banning Arab parties from election●Israels Wahlkampf mit harten Bandagen - Ausschluss arabischer Parteien? In dieser Woche soll Israels Oberster Gerichtsho
Israel's Supreme Court is expected to decide this week whether Arab parties can be barred from running in the upcoming elections. The attempt to exclude them has triggered anger and uncertainty among Arab citizens and their representatives, adding a contentious dimension to an already heated election campaign in Israel.
- 18Cleric says Khamenei was injured and pulled from Tehran hospital rubble▼Khamenei injured before Iran war, pulled from Tehran hospital rubble after strike, cleric says
An Iranian cleric claims Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was injured before the war with Iran began and had to be pulled from the rubble of a hospital in Tehran after an Israeli strike. The claim has been reported by The Jerusalem Post but has not been independently confirmed, and Iran has not officially commented. The reported injury, if true, would shed new light on the Supreme Leader's visibility and condition during the conflict.
- 19Sotomayor Apologizes to Kavanaugh Over Immigration Opinion Criticism▼Justice Sotomayor apologizes to Justice Kavanaugh for public criticism of immigration opinion
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The rare public rift between sitting justices drew attention because the court typically presents a unified front, and disagreements are usually aired in written dissents rather than direct personal remarks. The apology appears aimed at defusing tensions within the institution.
- 20Iran's president says Khamenei has no specific health issues●Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei has no 'specific' health issues: President
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian says Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has no specific health problems, responding to speculation about the 85-year-old leader's condition. The reassurance comes amid recurring rumors about Khamenei's wellbeing, which have circulated for years given his age and long hold on power. Officials in Tehran have repeatedly moved to deny such reports.
- 21Justice Alito steps aside from major climate case in reversal▼In reversal, Justice Samuel Alito steps aside from major climate case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate case, reversing an earlier decision to take part. The move comes amid scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest surrounding the justice. The reversal is drawing attention to ethical questions facing the Supreme Court and to the stakes of the climate litigation, which could have significant consequences for environmental regulation in the United States.
- 22Justice Alito Recuses Himself from Landmark Climate Case▼Supreme Court Justice Alito steps aside from landmark climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to reports from USA Today and the Detroit Free Press. The move means the remaining eight justices will decide the landmark litigation. His withdrawal is drawing attention because recusals at the Supreme Court are rare and the case could shape US climate policy.
- 23Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate case▼Justice Samuel Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.
- 24Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate case▼Supreme Court Justice Alito will not participate in big climate change case next week
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case when it is heard next week. The case is one of the most significant climate-related disputes to reach the Court, and his absence leaves eight justices to decide it, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. No reason for his non-participation has been given in the announcement.
- 25Justice Alito recuses from pivotal Supreme Court climate case▼Alito will not participate in pivotal climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending climate change case, according to multiple US news outlets. No reason for his recusal was given in the reports. His absence could affect the outcome of the case, which is seen as pivotal for climate-related litigation and regulation in the United States.
- 26Samuel Alito Recuses Himself From Major Climate Case▼Samuel Alito steps aside in a major climate case amid scrutiny over oil stock holdings
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate case amid scrutiny over his holdings in oil stocks. The decision removes him from proceedings with potentially far-reaching consequences for climate regulation, and it has renewed debate over the ethical standards and financial disclosure rules governing Supreme Court justices.
- 27Justice Alito steps aside from major Supreme Court climate case▼Alito bows out of blockbuster Supreme Court climate case
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.
- 28Justice Alito sits out Supreme Court climate case against oil companies▼US Supreme Court's Alito won't participate in climate case involving oil companies
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.
- 29Trump lashes out as his power wanes●‘The weaker he gets, the more dangerous he gets’: Trump lashes out as his power wanes https://www. theguardian.com/news/
The Guardian has published an analysis describing Donald Trump as striking out at critics and institutions as his political grip weakens, under the headline 'The weaker he gets, the more dangerous he gets'. The piece points to his attacks on the Federal Reserve and the Supreme Court and ties his behaviour to the looming 2026 midterm elections, with commentators warning that a weakened Trump may become more unpredictable.
- 30Supreme Court to weigh Boulder wildfire climate lawsuit▼Supreme Court to consider Boulder wildfire climate-change lawsuit
The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.
- 31Report: Mojtaba Khamenei injured in Tehran strike●Mojtaba Khamenei injured before Iran war, pulled from Tehran hospital rubble after strike - report
A report by The Jerusalem Post claims Mojtaba Khamenei, son of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and seen as a potential successor, was injured ahead of the Iran war and was pulled from the rubble of a Tehran hospital after an Israeli strike. The claim has not been officially confirmed by Iranian authorities, and details about his condition remain unclear.
- 32Supreme Court Ruling On Disputed Election May Clash With State Law▼Supreme Court Ruling On Disputed Election May Conflict With State Law
A Supreme Court ruling concerning a disputed election may conflict with existing state law, according to reporting by Honolulu Civil Beat. The ruling raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial decisions and state statutes point in different directions. Further details about which state, which election, and the specific legal provisions involved were not provided in the available information.
- 33Justice Alito Recuses from Major Supreme Court Climate Case▼Justice Alito steps aside from major Supreme Court climate case
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.
- 34Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate Case▼Alito recuses himself days before major climate-change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.
- 35Supreme Court allows state bans on transgender girls in school sports●Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender girls in girls' sports
The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.
- 36Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped voter database for now▼Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.
- 37
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift a lower-court block on its policy concerning transgender inmates, which reportedly involves housing inmates according to their sex assigned at birth. A lower court had paused the policy while litigation continues. The request puts the dispute before the nation's highest court, adding to a series of emergency applications the administration has filed on contested policy matters.
- 38Supreme Court ruling could weaken Black voting power in the South▼Supreme Court ruling could weaken Black voting power across the South
A recent Supreme Court ruling is being reported as a potential setback for Black voters across the South, with multiple regional outlets in South Carolina and the broader region carrying the same warning. Coverage suggests the decision could make it harder to draw majority-Black districts, diluting Black electoral influence in Southern states.
- 39Justice Alito recuses from Supreme Court climate lawsuits case▼Alito recuses from case that could toss climate suits against oil companies
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine the fate of climate lawsuits brought by states and municipalities against major oil companies. Without giving a reason, Alito's removal leaves eight justices to weigh whether the suits, which seek damages for climate change harms, can proceed. The outcome could reshape how oil companies are held accountable for emissions, making the case one of the most consequential climate-related matters to reach the high court.
- 40Virginia Democrats take redistricting fight to US Supreme Court▼Virginia Democrats ask US Supreme Court to override state court on nixing redistricting plan
Virginia Democrats have asked the US Supreme Court to step in after a state court rejected their redistricting plan. The dispute centers on legislative district maps drawn by the Democratically controlled state government, which were struck down by Virginia's courts. The appeal puts the justices in the middle of a politically charged fight over who controls the state's district boundaries ahead of future elections.