search
US jury
Trends
- 1US jury orders Apple to pay $5.7 billion in haptic patent case●US jury says Apple owes record $5.7 billion in haptic technology patent case
A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in a patent infringement case over haptic technology, the vibration feedback used in iPhones and other devices. The verdict is one of the largest patent damages awards against Apple to date, and the company is widely expected to appeal the decision.
- 2Apple ordered to pay record $5.7 billion in haptic patent case●US jury says Apple owes record $5.7B in haptic technology patent case
A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay $5.7 billion in damages for infringing patents on haptic technology, the vibration feedback used in its iPhones and other devices. The award is described as a record sum in a patent case, and the verdict is drawing wide attention given its size and Apple's history of costly patent disputes.
- 3Apple hit with $5.7 billion verdict over haptic technology▼Apple hit with $5.7 billion verdict over iPhone and Apple Watch haptic technology
A US jury has ordered Apple to pay $5.7 billion in damages over claims that haptic feedback technology used in the iPhone and Apple Watch infringed patented technology. The verdict is one of the larger patent rulings against the company in recent years, and Apple is expected to appeal. Legal observers are watching whether the damages figure will stand.
- 4Jury orders Apple to pay $5.7 billion in haptics patent case●Haptics tech company Taction sued Apple in 2021, alleging it infringed two of its patents. Now a federal jury in San Die
A federal jury in San Diego has ordered Apple to pay more than $5.7 billion in damages to Taction, a haptics technology company that sued in 2021 claiming Apple infringed two of its patents, US Patent Nos. 10,659,885 and 10,820,117. The verdict, covering technology related to haptic feedback, is one of the largest patent damages awards against Apple.
- 5
A US jury has ordered Apple to pay a record $5.7 billion in damages in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback features used in its devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent awards in US history and may prompt an appeal, while reigniting debate over patent litigation against major technology companies.