search
US jury
Trends
- 1Apple ordered to pay record $5.7 billion in patent case▼US jury says Apple owes record $5.7 billion in haptic technology patent case
A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the feedback feature used in iPhones and other devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent damages awards in US history, and attention is turning to whether Apple will appeal the decision.
- 2US jury orders Apple to pay $5.7 billion in haptic patent case●US jury says Apple owes record $5.7B in haptic technology patent case
A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in damages in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback systems used in its devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent damages awards ever issued in the United States, and discussion is focused on what the ruling means for Apple and for future haptic patent litigation.
- 3
A US jury has ordered Apple to pay a record $5.7 billion in damages in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback features used in its devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent awards in US history and may prompt an appeal, while reigniting debate over patent litigation against major technology companies.
- 4Apple ordered to pay $5.7 billion in patent verdict●Patent-Urteil: Apple soll 5,7 Milliarden Dollar zahlen Apples Vibration von iPhone und Apple Watch verletzt Patente, bef
A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay 5.7 billion dollars after finding that the vibration function used in the iPhone and Apple Watch infringes patents held by another American company. The verdict is one of the largest patent damage awards against Apple and is likely to be appealed, with observers watching closely for the company's next legal move.
- 5Apple hit with $5.7 billion verdict over haptic technology▼Apple hit with $5.7 billion verdict over iPhone and Apple Watch haptic technology
A US jury has ordered Apple to pay $5.7 billion in damages over claims that the haptic feedback technology used in the iPhone and Apple Watch infringes patents held by another company. The verdict is one of the largest patent awards against the company and may still face appeals.