Mmastodon WorldPolitics first seen 16 h ago, last 13 h ago, peak #1
Commentary disputes feasibility of threatening remarks about LA and San Diego
Original: I _will_ talk about this more, but when Shitstain went off about "taking out" LA and San Diego, I said that was a fantas
A widely shared political commentary argues that recent remarks about "taking out" Los Angeles and San Diego were fantasy rather than a workable plan, and that the reaction of crowds at the events matters more than the words themselves. Commenters are debating whether such rhetoric should be treated as serious policy or dismissed as bluster, with some warning against normalising violent language toward American cities.
Why now: People are reacting to inflammatory political rhetoric about targeting major US cities and questioning how seriously to take it.
Los AngelesSan DiegoDonald Trump
Evidence
- I _will_ talk about this more, but when Shitstain went off about "taking out" LA and San Diego, I said that was a fantasy and the crowd reaction was more important. Belle makes the same point today, but MORE importantly, describes how when people talk about his insanity as… · moira@mastodon.murkworks.net · 8
API: https://socialmediatrends-api.osmike.com/v1/trends/1333393