The Supremes

The US Supreme Court has invalidated most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, according to ABC News. The ruling strikes down a central pillar of the president's trade policy, which had used sweeping import duties as a key economic and political tool. The decision is expected to trigger major fallout for trade policy and the administration's agenda.

Breaking news footage shows Donald Trump at the US Supreme Court, according to a widely viewed update circulating online. Details of the purpose of his appearance and any ruling or proceedings involved have not yet been confirmed, and viewers are reacting to the unusual sight of a former president at the court.

Donald Trump's legal battle over Deutsche Bank records is back in focus after a Supreme Court ruling addressing whether his financial documents can be obtained. The case centres on subpoenas seeking years of banking records tied to Trump's business dealings. Commentators are weighing what the decision means for presidential financial transparency and the limits of congressional and prosecutorial power over a sitting president's private records.

Denmark's Supreme Court has ruled that child sexual abuse material generated by artificial intelligence falls under the country's CSAM laws, even when no real child is depicted. The judgment means possession or distribution of AI-generated abuse imagery can be prosecuted the same as material involving real children, closing a technological loophole and setting a precedent likely to influence other jurisdictions.

The South Carolina Supreme Court has overturned the murder convictions of Alex Murdaugh, the disgraced former attorney convicted in 2023 of killing his wife Maggie and son Paul. The ruling throws out the guilty verdicts from his high-profile double murder trial, reopening one of the most closely followed criminal cases in recent American history.

The US Supreme Court is weighing how a 1980s-era privacy law written for videotape rentals applies to the modern online advertising industry. The case asks whether the Video Privacy Protection Act, which bars disclosing renters' viewing records, covers data shared through streaming services and digital ad targeting. The outcome could reshape how much of consumers' viewing behavior companies may share for advertising purposes.

The Supreme Court is hearing a case concerning 401(k) retirement plans and the use of private funds, focusing on whether underperformance of such investments can ground legal claims by plan participants. The dispute could shape how retirement plan fiduciaries are held accountable for fund selection and performance. Readers are debating the potential consequences for retirement savings and plan oversight.

The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to impose restrictions on mail-in voting, dealing a setback to efforts to tighten voting rules ahead of elections. The ruling preserves broader access to postal ballots, and the decision is drawing attention from both voting-rights advocates and election officials nationwide.

Indian opposition leaders are marching to the Supreme Court in Delhi to demand the resignation of the country's chief election commissioner. The protest escalates a growing standoff between opposition parties and India's election authorities over the conduct and credibility of the electoral process, drawing wide national and international attention.

Several of Donald Trump's signature policies are heading to the US Supreme Court for review, with immigration, climate and gun regulations expected to be at the centre of the cases. The rulings could reshape major areas of federal policy and test the limits of presidential authority, drawing close attention from both supporters and critics across the political spectrum.

Democrats are discussing possible reforms to the US Supreme Court, with proposals reportedly including term limits for justices, an expanded bench, and a binding ethics code. Supporters argue the court's legitimacy has been damaged by ethics controversies and sweeping rulings, while Republicans frame the push as an attempt to reshape a conservative-leaning court. The debate remains largely exploratory, with no consensus on specific measures or their prospects.

Spain's Government has described the Supreme Court's ruling on the so-called grandchildren law as being of 'extraordinary' importance. The decision concerns the law allowing descendants of Spaniards to claim Spanish nationality, a measure that has drawn huge demand from Latin America. The government's reaction signals the ruling's broad implications for hundreds of thousands of citizenship applicants awaiting resolution of their cases.

The US Supreme Court heard arguments and appeared skeptical of state-level lawsuits seeking to hold oil producers liable for climate change damages. Justices questioned whether states like California can pursue such claims in state courts, in a case watched closely by both the energy industry and environmental advocates. A ruling could shape the path of dozens of climate liability cases across the country.

The Supreme Court has granted the Trump administration's request to pause a lower court ruling in a dispute over political advertising rates. The decision puts the lower court's ruling on hold while the case proceeds, giving the administration a temporary win in a fight with implications for how much broadcasters can charge for political ads.

Brazil is discussing Supreme Court justice Alexandre de Moraes as Senator-elect Flávio Bolsonaro visited his father, former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is under house arrest in São Paulo. The visit drew public support, while an elected senator said impeaching STF ministers 'will be pedagogical', keeping tensions between Congress and the court in the spotlight.

India's Supreme Court has struck down Yes Bank's controversial write-off of around $880 million in additional tier-1 (AT-1) bonds, a move made during the lender's 2020 rescue that wiped out retail investors. The ruling means bondholders may recover their money, and it has raised questions across Indian banking about how AT-1 instruments are treated in future bank resolutions.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi entered the Supreme Court of India, drawing claims of a security breach and raising alarm among commentators. The incident has prompted debate over protocols for high-profile visitors at the court and questions about how his entry was handled, with concerns circulating widely across Indian media and social platforms.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The unusual public rift between the two justices drew attention because sitting justices rarely call out one another's rulings openly, making the apology itself a notable moment at the Court.

The US Supreme Court is hearing a case that tests whether the Video Privacy Protection Act, a 1980s law written after a Supreme Court nominee's rental records were leaked, applies to modern digital newsletters and online subscriptions. The dispute centres on whether sharing readers' names or email activity with third parties counts as knowingly disclosing rental information, with broad implications for online privacy litigation.

The Supreme Court has taken up a case over whether the public can access records of DOGE, the cost-cutting initiative associated with Elon Musk's role in the Trump administration. The dispute centers on transparency obligations, with arguments over whether the body's documents fall under federal open-records laws. The outcome could shape how much scrutiny government efficiency efforts face from citizens and watchdogs.

Democratic-led cities have gone to the Supreme Court asking it to preserve a Biden-era immigration rule, which they say is being dismantled through a backdoor deal rather than the normal legal process. The cities argue the rule should not be erased without full litigation, and the dispute has drawn attention as a test of how far the administration can go to unwind predecessor policies outside the courts.

The US Supreme Court has again ruled in favor of Republicans in a legal fight over political television advertising, according to a New York Times report. The decision adds to a pattern of recent rulings in which the court's conservative majority has backed Republican positions in election-related cases, drawing criticism from Democrats and campaign finance watchdogs who argue the court is tilting the rules governing political ads ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court has again ruled in favour of Republicans in a legal clash over the rates broadcasters may charge for political advertisements. The decision, reported by Reuters and regional outlets, concerns whether TV stations can offer candidates lower ad rates than other political advertisers under federal election law.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case testing whether a lawsuit over internet practices can proceed under the Video Privacy Protection Act, a 1988 law passed after a Supreme Court nominee's video rentals were disclosed. Justices appeared inclined to let the suit move forward, a ruling that could expand the nearly forgotten statute's use against modern online data-sharing.

The US Supreme Court has again ruled in favour of President Trump in a dispute over his campaign advertising, according to USA Today. The decision marks another instance of the court backing Trump in a legal fight tied to his political messaging. The details of the ruling and its implications for campaign ad rules were not immediately clear.

A Supreme Court case over internet privacy is underway, with early arguments and commentary suggesting consumers hold the advantage. Observers following the showdown say the outcome could shape how much protection individuals have over their personal data online, making it a closely watched test of digital privacy rights in the United States.

Donald Trump reacted to the Supreme Court upholding birthright citizenship, saying 'too bad' about the decision, and is pushing Congress to pass legislation to end the constitutional guarantee of citizenship for children born on US soil. The comments renew a long-running fight over the 14th Amendment, which legal experts widely say cannot be overturned by ordinary legislation.

The US Supreme Court is hearing a case that tests whether the Video Privacy Protection Act, a 1980s law written after a video rental leak, applies to modern internet newsletters and digital subscriptions. The justices must decide how a statute written for VHS rentals fits an era of online data sharing, a ruling with broad implications for digital privacy law.

The Supreme Court has declined to disturb existing rules governing the rates broadcasters may charge for political advertising, keeping the current framework in place as the election nears. Stations will continue operating under the longstanding lowest-unit-rate requirements for candidates. The decision, reported by Inside Radio, preserves the status quo during a peak campaign advertising season without signaling broader changes to political media regulation.

The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments on a fresh interpretation of an old statute, according to SCOTUSblog. The case asks how a long-standing law applies to modern circumstances, and the justices' questions will shape the ruling's reach. Observers are watching closely because the outcome could reshape how the statute is enforced nationwide.

Rahul Gandhi is leading a March For Democracy in New Delhi, with demonstrators walking from Barakhamba Road to the Supreme Court. The live-streamed procession has drawn heavy public attention, with well over a million people engaging with coverage of the event as it unfolds, making the opposition march one of the most-watched political stories of the moment.

A man who had been released from prison now faces being sent back for life following a Supreme Court ruling interpreting the First Step Act, the 2018 law that reduced sentences for certain federal drug offenses. The decision narrows who qualifies for relief under the act, and the man's case has become an example of its limits.

A recent Supreme Court ruling is being credited with reshaping how candidates and outside groups approach advertising ahead of the midterm elections. Commentators say the decision changes the rules around political ads, potentially affecting how campaigns spend and message in the run-up to voting. Details of the ruling and its practical impact remain limited in early coverage.

India's Supreme Court has reprimanded the Delhi Police, demanding the restoration of internet services, the reopening of the Metro, and the removal of barricades put up in the capital. The rebuke has drawn wide attention, with observers framing it as a sharp judicial pushback against security measures that have disrupted daily life for Delhi residents, including commuters and those relying on internet access.

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Republican groups in a dispute over the cost of airing campaign advertisements. According to the Los Angeles Times, the decision gives Republican candidates an advertising edge in the final weeks of the campaign, prompting debate over its impact on the midterm races and campaign finance rules.