Uphold

Donald Trump reacted to the Supreme Court upholding birthright citizenship, saying 'too bad,' and is pushing legislation to end the practice anyway. The exchange highlights the ongoing fight over the 14th Amendment guarantee of citizenship to children born on US soil, with Trump seeking a congressional route after the court declined to side with his position.

A US appeals court has upheld the designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, a ruling with implications for the Pentagon's ability to work with the firm. The decision, reported by CNBC, is drawing attention in technology and defense circles as it could affect federal contracting with major AI developers and raises questions about security scrutiny of leading AI companies.

The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.

At the 2026 United Nations General Assembly, the European Union is presenting a platform centred on strengthening multilateralism, upholding international law, and reforming the UN. The bloc is positioning itself as a defender of the rules-based international order, with EU diplomatic messaging at the assembly emphasising institutional renewal at the world body.

An opinion piece argues that United Nations diplomacy is at a critical juncture as wars continue and prospects for peace remain uncertain. It contends the organisation's ability to mediate conflicts and uphold international stability is under strain, raising questions about the relevance and effectiveness of multilateral diplomacy in the current global climate.

Spain's Government has confirmed it will uphold its decrees and has challenged the opposition parties PP, Vox, and Junts to "show their true colors" in the upcoming vote in Congress. The move sets up a direct confrontation over the decrees' validation, with the governing coalition framing the vote as a test of whether the right-wing parties and Junts will back or block the measures.

A US appeals court has upheld the Pentagon's decision to designate AI company Anthropic as a risk, a ruling that keeps the defence department's assessment in place. The decision touches on how the US military evaluates artificial intelligence firms and their technologies. Reaction so far has focused on the implications for government oversight of leading AI developers and their work with national security institutions.

Federal courts have issued rulings upholding a gun ban, though judges relied on differing and conflicting legal theories to reach the same outcome. The split reasoning is drawing attention because it could create inconsistent legal standards for similar restrictions and may invite further appeals or review by a higher court.

The Supreme Court has upheld the demotion of a police officer who was disciplined for harassment, confirming the penalty handed down against him. The ruling settles the dispute over the punishment and reinforces that harassment within the force can justify career-level demotion. Reactions are likely to focus on accountability in law enforcement and the standards for disciplining officers over misconduct toward colleagues or the public.

Brazil's electoral court has a majority to uphold restrictions on posts by Antonio Tabet, the coordinator of the Planalto's communications office (Secom), after Flávio Bolsonaro asked the TRE-DF to bar him from publishing about elections on social media. The case involved a Tabet post linking the senator to Our Lady of the apparitions, which the TSE judged to be fake news. Prosecutor Paulo Mendonça changed his vote to allow the post, and commentators called it a defeat for broad censorship efforts. Tabet must now refrain from election-related posts.

The Supreme Court has upheld the demotion of an officer found responsible for misconduct, confirming the disciplinary decision at the highest judicial level. The ruling settles the case in favor of the disciplinary authorities and sets a precedent for how similar misconduct cases within the service may be handled going forward.

A federal appeals court has sided with Hawaii, upholding the state's requirements that gun permit applicants complete the process within a set window and that authorities can inspect firearms registered to permit holders. The ruling keeps in place two of Hawaii's strict firearms provisions, which are among the toughest in the United States, as legal battles over the scope of Second Amendment protections continue across the country.

A court has upheld its ruling on the contentious Drumcree parade in Portadown, Northern Ireland, after what was described as an unprecedented late-night hearing. The Drumcree dispute, involving Orange Order marches and the Parades Commission, has long been one of the region's most sensitive flashpoints. Details of the legal challenge and the court's reasoning remain limited in initial reporting.

South Korea's Supreme Court has upheld the demotion of a police officer, citing a confession the officer recorded in a personal sketchbook. The ruling confirms that the handwritten confession could be used to justify the disciplinary demotion. The decision settles the disciplinary case and offers guidance on how personal written records can factor into police misconduct proceedings.

New Jersey's Tax Court has thrown out a legal challenge to the state's tax rules covering internet activity, upholding the regulations as written. The ruling means businesses affected by how New Jersey taxes online activity will have to comply with the current framework, and it clears the way for the state to continue applying those rules without further litigation, at least for now.

The United Nations is observing the International Day for Universal Access to Information on 28 September. The 2026 edition focuses on 'Upholding Information Integrity in the Digital Age,' highlighting the role of access to information in addressing misinformation and protecting reliable public information online. Observances draw attention to citizens' rights to government-held information and the challenges of maintaining trustworthy information ecosystems in an era of digital misinformation.

An Altoona man will still face an attempted murder charge after a court decision to uphold it, according to the Altoona Mirror. The report gives no further details about the defendant, the alleged incident, or the reasoning behind the ruling. It remains unclear whether the case will proceed to trial or whether additional charges are involved.

A judge has ruled in favor of Marshall County officials, upholding their decision to deny approval of a massive solar energy project. The ruling means the proposed development cannot move forward as planned. The case highlights ongoing tensions in rural communities between renewable energy developers and local governments weighing land use, agricultural concerns, and resident opposition.

A federal court has upheld Arizona's landmark campaign finance transparency law, a decision welcomed by the Campaign Legal Center, which had backed the measure. The ruling requires greater disclosure of money in state political campaigns. Supporters say it is a win for voters' right to know who funds political activity, while critics of such laws often argue they burden donors and political groups.

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley announced that a state circuit court has ruled a murder defendant received effective legal counsel. The decision upholds the defendant's conviction, rejecting an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim. Details about the case, the defendant, or possible appeals were not included in the announcement, but the ruling is being reported by state news outlets as a notable criminal justice development.

Commentators in New Zealand are pressing political parties to state plainly, before coalition negotiations begin, which environmental protections they will uphold, what they intend to change, and how they will pay for delivery. The argument is that safeguarding the environment does not require sacrificing prosperity, and that voters deserve direct answers rather than vague positioning while government formation talks take shape.

The Iowa Supreme Court has upheld the removal of a county official who was removed from office over intoxication. The ruling closes a legal challenge to the ouster and affirms that local officials can be removed for misconduct of this kind. Details about the official's identity and the circumstances of the case have not been provided.

Israel's Supreme Court has overturned a decision by the Central Elections Committee to bar Arab parties from running in the parliamentary election at the end of October. The ruling means Arab lists will appear on the ballot in what is seen as a pivotal vote, and the decision is drawing attention to the tensions between the judiciary and election officials over political participation.

The Hawaii Supreme Court has upheld caps on attorney fees in litigation arising from the deadly Maui wildfires. The ruling affects lawyers seeking compensation from settlements tied to the disaster, which devastated Lahaina in 2023 and killed more than 100 people. The decision limits how much attorneys can collect from settlement funds, with implications for victims' recovery and ongoing legal proceedings.

Thai authorities have dismissed a legal challenge concerning ballot secrecy and confirmed the results of the 2026 general election. The ruling means the electoral outcome stands as certified, with no recount or annulment resulting from the complaint. Details about who filed the challenge and on what specific grounds have not been widely reported.

Global Rights Compliance took part in the 4th Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia Summer Academy on Business and Human Rights. The academy brings together practitioners and experts from the region to discuss how companies and states can uphold human rights standards in business operations. Further details about GRC's specific role or contributions at the event were not provided.

An Arizona appeals court has upheld the rejection of referenda that sought to let Marana voters weigh in on a proposed data center project. The ruling leaves in place the earlier decision blocking the measures from reaching the ballot. The case highlights ongoing tensions in Arizona communities over large data center developments and residents' efforts to force public votes on them.

An appeal has been filed challenging a federal district court ruling that upheld Oregon's extended producer responsibility (EPR) law, which requires producers to fund the recycling of their packaging. Americans for Tax Reform highlighted the challenge, framing it as part of broader opposition to EPR mandates that critics say raise costs for businesses and consumers. Supporters of the law argue it shifts recycling burdens off taxpayers and onto manufacturers.

A Wyoming secretary of state, identified as Secretary Gray, has publicly praised the Wyoming Supreme Court's decision to uphold the state's primary election system. The ruling keeps the current primary framework in place, and Gray welcomed the outcome as a validation of how Wyoming conducts its elections. Beyond the announcement of her endorsement, few details about the ruling or reactions from other officials have been reported.

A definition circulating online describes a 'Masonic Charlatan' as a person who exploits bonds of friendship within a Lodge for personal and material gain. The author argues that Freemasonry is an ethical order where business interests and networking have no place, prompting discussion about misuse of fraternal ties and the values Freemasonry is meant to uphold.

A federal judge has upheld an Idaho law that prohibits daycares from requiring vaccines or other medical treatments for the children in their care. The ruling leaves Idaho daycare providers unable to impose immunization requirements, keeping the state among the most permissive in the US on childhood vaccine rules. Supporters of the law view it as protecting parental choice, while public health advocates warn it could increase the risk of disease outbreaks in childcare settings.

A New York appellate court has upheld a lower court ruling that voids rule changes made by the Brooklyn Democratic Party. The decision leaves the party's internal rules as they stood before the contested amendments, a blow to party leadership that had defended the changes. The ruling is being closely watched in local political circles ahead of upcoming primary contests in Brooklyn.